| Revision as of 20:47, 31 January 2010 edit130.232.214.10 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:49, 16 February 2010 edit undoTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits ==Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident== {{subst:uw-probation|Climatic Research Unit hacking incident|Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation}} -- ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| :NOTE: this IP is a randomly assigned public one under spark.net, operated by Åbo Akademi University and the University of Turku(?). As such, several people may make edits under this single IP. (Another person than the above one) ] (]) 12:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | :NOTE: this IP is a randomly assigned public one under spark.net, operated by Åbo Akademi University and the University of Turku(?). As such, several people may make edits under this single IP. (Another person than the above one) ] (]) 12:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::Very good point! (Not talking to myself.)] (]) 20:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ::Very good point! (Not talking to myself.)] (]) 20:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| ] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].|}} {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> -- ] 02:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:49, 16 February 2010
Disclosure: 91.153.115.15 is my secondary IP.
Welcome to Misplaced Pages
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but I highly recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (130.232.214.10) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! dave souza, talk 16:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Gates to avoid
As item A of the FAQ at the top of Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident reminds us, -gates are among words to avoid in relation to our neutral point of view policy. The issue of glacier shrinkage that you've expressed interest in is covered at Criticism of the IPCC AR4, and has no direct relevance to the hacked e-mails. The source you've given a link to does seem to cover several viewpoints on that issue, and looks useful. Thanks, dave souza, talk 16:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I checked out the IPCC critique but in my opinion it does not capture the depth to which these two unrelated issues have affected the debate. I am scientist and interact with other scientists on a daily basis. "Climategate" brought to general attention the charged atmosphere and previous controversies in climate science. Add to this the IPCC screw-up and I can now report that two professors and about a dozen good researchers I work with openly express very negative opinions regarding climate science. Obviously I can not show a written reference for such a change in attitude but I simply want to express my strong worry regarding how climate science as well as science and scientists in general will be viewed in future. I would like to express this shift in perception but I am at a loss how this can be done in a neutral and constructive way. Food for thought? 130.232.214.10 (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- NOTE: this IP is a randomly assigned public one under spark.net, operated by Åbo Akademi University and the University of Turku(?). As such, several people may make edits under this single IP. (Another person than the above one) 130.232.214.10 (talk) 12:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Very good point! (Not talking to myself.)130.232.214.10 (talk) 20:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 02:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)