| Revision as of 21:35, 11 February 2010 editDayewalker (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,182 edits →Sockpuppetry: Oh, please please please...← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:55, 16 February 2010 edit undoKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits →Stopping: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| Fred the Osyter and Dayewalker are socks. The individual is using socks to win the edit war with myself and avoid 3RR violation. No sufficient explanation has been offered as to why my contribution is unacceptable. Even if my edit were wrong, that doesn't excuse the sockpuppetry. Consider the fact that both accounts are editing the same article with the same agenda, and both have misspelled "lead as "lede" both in the edit summary and on my talk page. I would like action to be taken, preferably in the form of a Sockpuppet investigation. ] (]) 21:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | Fred the Osyter and Dayewalker are socks. The individual is using socks to win the edit war with myself and avoid 3RR violation. No sufficient explanation has been offered as to why my contribution is unacceptable. Even if my edit were wrong, that doesn't excuse the sockpuppetry. Consider the fact that both accounts are editing the same article with the same agenda, and both have misspelled "lead as "lede" both in the edit summary and on my talk page. I would like action to be taken, preferably in the form of a Sockpuppet investigation. ] (]) 21:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| : IP85, why don't you register an account? Then you can file the sockpuppet report yourself, if you feel there's some kind of sockpuppet effort against you. ] (]) 21:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | : IP85, why don't you register an account? Then you can file the sockpuppet report yourself, if you feel there's some kind of sockpuppet effort against you. ] (]) 21:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Stopping == | |||
| '''Please don't''' Your note on my talk was simply rude and ]. Your edit summary claiming that I was trolling is patently false. I fail to see how converting HTML elements and applying ] is in any way petulant or disruptive; as such, I have no plans to stop. Also, your edits to ] are breaking the template, so they should be fixed. If you want to discuss something with me civilly, I would be happy to do so. If you continue with your aggressive and rude behavior (this includes your inappropriate addition to ]), I will report your behavior to ]. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 20:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:55, 16 February 2010
December 2009
Message from 75.4.202.97
Thank you for explaining what was behind that comment by that gentleman. I don't want to use any names and I didn't want to put this on the talk page where you put your message because others might match it up easily. Please delete this message from your talk page as soon as you read it. I don’t know how to phrase what I want to say. I am concerned who might read it, but here goes. His thought process concerns me. Should I be concerned about my safety? Has anything happened to anyone he has felt threatened by or anyone he has disagreed with? Would you advise closing my account on Misplaced Pages? Any other thoughts? Please do not mention his name in replying. Thank you..--75.4.202.97 (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Please Pleas Me
Just because it is remastered doesn't make it a different album. All releases of the album after the first are re-releases. McLerristarr (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
moved to poster's talk
Album infoboxes
More informative I tried to make the infoboxes more informative by listing the location where the album was recorded. I personally dislike the arbitrary line breaks, but I'm ultimately indifferent to them. Please review this revert; you may wish to be more careful in the future. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
Fred the Osyter and Dayewalker are socks. The individual is using socks to win the edit war with myself and avoid 3RR violation. No sufficient explanation has been offered as to why my contribution is unacceptable. Even if my edit were wrong, that doesn't excuse the sockpuppetry. Consider the fact that both accounts are editing the same article with the same agenda, and both have misspelled "lead as "lede" both in the edit summary and on my talk page. I would like action to be taken, preferably in the form of a Sockpuppet investigation. 85.210.175.63 (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- IP85, why don't you register an account? Then you can file the sockpuppet report yourself, if you feel there's some kind of sockpuppet effort against you. Dayewalker (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Stopping
Please don't Your note on my talk was simply rude and uncivil. Your edit summary claiming that I was trolling is patently false. I fail to see how converting HTML elements and applying WP:DASH is in any way petulant or disruptive; as such, I have no plans to stop. Also, your edits to Hollie Steel are breaking the template, so they should be fixed. If you want to discuss something with me civilly, I would be happy to do so. If you continue with your aggressive and rude behavior (this includes your inappropriate addition to Talk:Remain in Light), I will report your behavior to WP:AN/I. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)