Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:27, 17 February 2010

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Archives

Archive 1 - Aug 2007 to Dec 2007 Archive 2 - Dec 2007 to August 2009 Archive 3 - August 2009 to Present

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Mitchkoi, no advertising here, was just a reference for people typing in Mitchkoi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchkoi (talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Neptunerover

Good block! Can I suggest, however, that the user-talkpage is protected, because they are currently filling it up with images, quotes and incomprehensible crap (seem to have spent several hours on it post-block) which makes it inaccessible to readers? :) ╟─TreasuryTag►directorate─╢ 16:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Rolling it back to the last readable version mightn't be a bad idea, either... ╟─TreasuryTag►constablewick─╢ 17:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Eeek. Good lord. Someone thinks Misplaced Pages is his webhost. --Smashville 20:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I suspect that he'll replace all that stuff, or produce some more, but worth a try, I guess ;) ╟─TreasuryTag►presiding officer─╢ 21:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I figured I'd give him a shot. I mean, he hasn't put up an unblock notice, yet he's adding quotes and stuff to his userpage. --Smashville 22:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

That and subsequent edits were predictable... ╟─TreasuryTag►Captain-Regent─╢ 13:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks like Lomn got him. His last couple were just copying straight from policies and guidelines. Weird. --Smashville 14:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Why delete Nat and olly

Hello i am a representative of nat and olly and all they want to do is show people they make funny videos and like to help charities, whats wrong with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Awsomejosh (talk • contribs) 21:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

There is no evidence whatsoever that they are notable per Misplaced Pages standards. --Smashville 22:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

ITN: Nodar Kumaritashvili

On 13 February 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Nodar Kumaritashvili, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 05:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy of Wii 2

Hi,

I noticed that you deleted Wii 2, but as far as I can tell from my research, it does appear to be a real thing, with potential specs out there, and with a possible 2010 release date. I think a nice article could be created. -Zeus- 22:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Considering this, unless there is info other than "nothing is known about it", there is no reason to recreate. --Smashville 22:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay, good point, especially considering that all of the sources are from exactly that date anyway. -Zeus- 22:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Plus, we know that within 15 minutes of it being announced, there will be pretty much a feature quality article on it. See iPad. --Smashville 14:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleted article recreated

Hi there. Just wanted to inform you that the article which you deleted has been recreated. Amsaim (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

kursk

hi have NO content dispute with him now, he reverts everythin of my edits, no explantion. even if i ask. he reverts everything this is no content dispute this is vandalizm he reverts cited material ] . he dont liks the numbers in the infobox an while he is changeing this numbers hes reverting everythin else too. for example the article says "hoth's spearhead III Panzercorps" , this is incorrect because the III Panzercorps was assigned to Kempf. than i change this and he reverts, where is this content dispute? he only reverts what i have done. today i created a map and added to the article. than i made a section on the discussion page explaing this map and saying: "if something is wrong please tell me i change the map then..." . and he DELETES. Blablaaa (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)