| Revision as of 10:16, 9 January 2006 edit64.142.78.202 (talk) →Disadvantages to shareholders of naked short selling← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:19, 9 January 2006 edit undo64.142.78.202 (talk) →Naked short selling's injury to shareholdersNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| == Naked short selling's injury to shareholders == | == Naked short selling's injury to shareholders == | ||
| Naked Short Selling causes an unnatural depression in share price by artificially and bogusly boosting the supply of shares available to the market. This results in a market inefficiency, as unlimited supply meeting fixed demand equates to price depression. Illegal naked short selling is a market manipulation tactic, and is really nothing more than fraud - a seller sells something that he doesn't own, and the buyer pays his money, receiving nothing in return but a brokerage statement representing an IOU for the shares ordered. The product remains undelivered, but the buyer is never notified that he hasn't received his share. In fact, naked shorters will not want the buyer to know that the shares came from thin air, and the number of shares shown on the confirmation and monthly statements is pure fiction. Meantime, the naked shorter gets to use the buyers' purchase money and to earn interest on it at low risk. Since naked shorters are typically able to create virtually unlimited artificial supply to drive share prices lower and later buy them back (cover) at significantly if not dramatically lower prices, substantial profits are made in such operations. | Naked Short Selling causes an unnatural depression in share price by artificially and bogusly boosting the supply of shares available to the market. This results in a market inefficiency, as unlimited supply meeting fixed demand equates to price depression. Illegal naked short selling is a market manipulation tactic, and is really nothing more than fraud - a seller sells something that he doesn't own, and the buyer pays his money, receiving nothing in return but a brokerage statement representing an IOU for the shares ordered. The product remains undelivered, but the buyer is never notified that he hasn't received his share. In fact, naked shorters will not want the buyer to know that the shares came from thin air, and the number of shares shown on the confirmation and monthly statements is pure fiction. Meantime, the naked shorter gets to use the buyers' purchase money and to earn interest on it at low risk. Since naked shorters are typically able to create virtually unlimited artificial supply to drive share prices lower and to later buy them back (cover) at significantly if not dramatically lower prices, substantial profits are made in such operations. | ||
| Companies are adversely affected when they need to do secondary offerings of stock to fund their growth or operations, and the price is artificially low. Investors are adversely affected when their stock is depressed, and if sold, sold for an artificially low price. Naked short selling as a trading strategy has been illegal since the creation of the SEC in 1934, but is still going strong because by its very nature, and especially today with electronic book-keeping being the norm, it is extremely difficult to detect without the self-incriminating confessions from the naked short sellers themselves. | Companies are adversely affected when they need to do secondary offerings of stock to fund their growth or operations, and the price is artificially low. Investors are adversely affected when their stock is depressed, and if sold, sold for an artificially low price. Naked short selling as a trading strategy has been illegal since the creation of the SEC in 1934, but is still going strong because by its very nature, and especially today with electronic book-keeping being the norm, it is extremely difficult to detect without the self-incriminating confessions from the naked short sellers themselves. | ||
Revision as of 10:19, 9 January 2006
You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|October 2005|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.
A naked short sale is when Short selling takes place on a security, but the seller does not borrow or arrange to borrow the securities in time for Settlement (finance) (in the major United States capital markets, settlement typically takes place 3 days after the transaction). As a result, the seller fails to deliver securities to the buyer when delivery is due; this is known in the securities industry as a "failure to deliver".
Naked short selling can threaten the stability of stock prices because stocks can be sold without having to first acquire them from existing owners. In practice, true naked shorts cannot be maintained by public investors since they must either have the shares borrowed for them by their brokers in advance or promptly deliver the physical shares. Therefore, true naked shorts are typically done by broker-dealers and market makers who are able to maintain such naked short positions in secrecy via simple electronic journaling or book-keeping, intra-firm, to customers who bought and who simply need to see share figures on their statements to feel assured. Although this is illegal as the stated share ownership is bogus, it can be extremely difficult to detect, unless the buyer requests physical delivery of share certificates, which is very rare these days. Even where such delivery is sought, the broker-dealer or market maker can always buy the needed shares on the open market, and deliver those, in the rare event delivery is sought.
In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission enacted Regulation SHO to prohibit Naked Short Selling. However, Regulation SHO makes an exception for market makers engaged in "bona fide market making". Market makers do not have to locate stock before selling short, because under certain circumstances they need to be able to provide liquidity. Regulation SHO also put in place a warning system against the risk of stock price instability by publicly identifying securities where short positions composed more than 10,000 shares and more than 0.5% of the Total Shares Outstanding for 5 consecutive settlement days or more.
Even after the enactment of Regulation SHO, naked short sales have again come under scrutiny due to the large number of stocks which have triggered the warning system.
Naked short selling's injury to shareholders
Naked Short Selling causes an unnatural depression in share price by artificially and bogusly boosting the supply of shares available to the market. This results in a market inefficiency, as unlimited supply meeting fixed demand equates to price depression. Illegal naked short selling is a market manipulation tactic, and is really nothing more than fraud - a seller sells something that he doesn't own, and the buyer pays his money, receiving nothing in return but a brokerage statement representing an IOU for the shares ordered. The product remains undelivered, but the buyer is never notified that he hasn't received his share. In fact, naked shorters will not want the buyer to know that the shares came from thin air, and the number of shares shown on the confirmation and monthly statements is pure fiction. Meantime, the naked shorter gets to use the buyers' purchase money and to earn interest on it at low risk. Since naked shorters are typically able to create virtually unlimited artificial supply to drive share prices lower and to later buy them back (cover) at significantly if not dramatically lower prices, substantial profits are made in such operations.
Companies are adversely affected when they need to do secondary offerings of stock to fund their growth or operations, and the price is artificially low. Investors are adversely affected when their stock is depressed, and if sold, sold for an artificially low price. Naked short selling as a trading strategy has been illegal since the creation of the SEC in 1934, but is still going strong because by its very nature, and especially today with electronic book-keeping being the norm, it is extremely difficult to detect without the self-incriminating confessions from the naked short sellers themselves.