Misplaced Pages

User talk:Neptunerover: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:57, 21 February 2010 editCunard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,034 edits {{subst:indef|historical}}; rm. old threads / soapboxing← Previous edit Revision as of 23:32, 21 February 2010 edit undoNeptunerover (talk | contribs)1,605 edits Riddle of the Sphinx?: why?Next edit →
Line 26: Line 26:


:::I too have seen enough...I AGF, but only up to a point. Time to move along and find somewhere else to play. Lock this page and move on. ] (]) 21:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC) :::I too have seen enough...I AGF, but only up to a point. Time to move along and find somewhere else to play. Lock this page and move on. ] (]) 21:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

All you had to say was no. What did I do wrong? I didn't use the unblock template to ask that question. What I wrote is not something forbidden on Misplaced Pages. --] (]) 23:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


== Inappropriate behavior == == Inappropriate behavior ==

Revision as of 23:32, 21 February 2010

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages.
(see: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • autoblocks)

Blocked

The user that started the thread (ANI) was indefinately blocked for continued disruptive editing here (ANI) and elsewhere immediately after his prior 12-hour block expired.
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuous disruptive and tendentious editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Smashville 21:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is neither MySpace nor a webhost. Per your continued use of this page in that format, this page has been courtesy blanked and locked. You may appeal the above block by mailing your unblock request to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. — Lomn 14:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Protection lifted after email exchange with NeptuneRover. — Lomn 04:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Riddle of the Sphinx?

Were Neptunerover to solve the Riddle of the Sphinx, or a similar modern-day conundrum by making sense of it, could he be released from his indefinite block? How about Colorless green ideas sleep furiously? --Neptunerover (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Personally, I think that riddle makes a whole lot of sense, perfect sense, and I can't believe it's just me! Why does stuff always have to make sense just to me? --Neptunerover (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

An unblock will be predicated on recognizing the causes for the block and avoidance of them from here out. Riddles are not involved. Neptune, I'll note that I'm receiving multiple questions about why I've unlocked this talk page since you apparently have no interest in attempting to edit productively. Unless something changes, I'm guessing this page will be relocked within the week. — Lomn 16:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
I would support a block (and content wipe) of both this and the corresponding User: page. NeptuneRover needs to understand that his time at Misplaced Pages is over and continuing to stir up controversy and grief - even at the level of just this page - is finished. He also needs to know that he's on my personal email blocklist so he can stop spamming me personally too because it's all going into the trashcan without me ever needing to see it. SteveBaker (talk) 21:29, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
I too have seen enough...I AGF, but only up to a point. Time to move along and find somewhere else to play. Lock this page and move on. Frmatt (talk) 21:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

All you had to say was no. What did I do wrong? I didn't use the unblock template to ask that question. What I wrote is not something forbidden on Misplaced Pages. --Neptunerover (talk) 23:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Inappropriate behavior

This sort of antagonism (the edit summary) is completely inappropriate. Do not repeat this sort of behavior. — Lomn 17:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

He came by and reverted me for the very same thing he got blocked for recently, and I also found it interesting that he failed to acknowledge my apology while previously he has seemed eager to discuss my behaviour. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. I will do my best to avoid future antagonizing edit summaries (even though he's told me to 'piss off' in more than one of his edit summaries--it's not appropriate, and I shall desist). --Neptunerover (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Category: