Revision as of 00:18, 22 February 2010 editHeadbomb (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors453,894 edits revert per admission of deceptive sourcing ← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:48, 22 February 2010 edit undoCount Iblis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,827 edits Revert. Headbomb did not even understand the jokeNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An '''infraparticle''' is an electrically charged particle and its surrounding cloud of ]s—of which there are infinite number, by virtue of the ] of ].<ref> | |||
{{Expand|date=January 2010}} | |||
'''Infraparticles''' are "charged particles permanently surrounded by an infinite cloud of soft photons below the visibility limit".<ref> | |||
{{cite arxiv | {{cite arxiv | ||
| |
|last=Schroer |first=B. | ||
|year=2008 | |year=2008 | ||
|title=A note on infraparticles and unparticles | |title=A note on infraparticles and unparticles | ||
|class=hep-th | |class=hep-th | ||
|eprint=0804.3563 | |eprint=0804.3563 | ||
}}</ref> That is, it is a ] rather than a ]. Whenever electric charges accelerate they emit ], whereby an infinite number of the ] soft photons become ]s. However, only a finite number of these photons are detectable, the remainder being below the measurement threshold.<ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|last=Kaku |first=M. | |||
|year=1993 | |||
|title=Quantum Field Theory: A Modern Introduction | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|pages=177–184, Appendix A6 | |||
|isbn=0195076524 | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
The form of the electric field at infinity, which is determined by the velocity of a ], defines ] for the particle's ]. This is unlike the usual ] description, where the Hilbert space includes particle states with different velocities.<ref name=Buchholz1986> | |||
In ] and ], in addition to the ] ] symmetry related to the ], there are also position dependent ]s. ] states that for every infinitesimal symmetry transformation that is local (local in the sense that the transformed value of a field at a given point only depends on the field configuration in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of that point), there is a corresponding conserved charge called the ], which is the space integral of a Noether density (assuming the integral converges and there is a ] satisfying the ]). | |||
{{cite journal | |||
|last=Buchholz |first=D. | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
*{{cite journal | |||
|author=D. Buchholz | |||
|year=1986 | |year=1986 | ||
|title=Gauss' law and the infraparticle problem | |||
|title= | |||
|journal=] | |journal=] | ||
|volume=174 |pages=331 | |volume=174 |pages=331 | ||
|doi=10.1016/0370-2693(86)91110-X | |||
|doi= | |||
}}</ref> | |||
Because of their infraparticle properties, charged particles do not have a sharp ] density of states like an ordinary particle, but instead the density of states rises like an inverse power at the mass of the particle. This collection of states which are very close in mass to m consist of the particle together with low-energy excitation of the electromagnetic field. | |||
== Noether's theorem for gauge transformations == | |||
In ] and ], in addition to the ] ] symmetry related to the ], there are also position dependent ]s.<ref> | |||
{{cite journal | |||
|last=Weyl |first=H. | |||
|year=1929 | |||
|title=Elektron und Gravitation I | |||
|journal=] | |||
|volume=56 |pages=330–352 | |||
|doi=10.1007/BF01339504 | |||
}}</ref> ] states that for every infinitesimal symmetry transformation that is local (local in the sense that the transformed value of a field at a given point only depends on the field configuration in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of that point), there is a corresponding conserved charge called the ], which is the space integral of a Noether density (assuming the integral converges and there is a ] satisfying the ]).<ref> | |||
{{cite arxiv | |||
|last=Noether |first=E. | |||
|last2=Tavel |first2=M.A. (transl.) | |||
|year=2005 | |||
|title=Invariant Variation Problems | |||
|class=physics.hist-ph | |||
|eprint=physics/0503066 | |||
}} | }} | ||
:Translation of {{cite journal | |||
|last=Noether |first=E. | |||
|year=1918 | |||
|title=Invariante Variationsprobleme | |||
|journal=], Math-phys. Klasse | |||
|volume= |pages=235–257 | |||
|doi= | |||
}}</ref> | |||
If this is applied to the global U(1) symmetry, the result | |||
:<math>Q=\int d^3x \rho(\vec{x})</math> (over all of space) | |||
is the conserved charge where ρ is the ]. As long as the surface integral | |||
:<math>\oint_{S^2} \vec{J}\cdot d\vec{S}</math> | |||
at the boundary at spatial infinity is zero, which is satisfied if the ] '''J''' falls off sufficiently fast, the quantity ''Q''<ref>''Q'' is the integral of the time component of the ] '''J''' by definition. See {{cite book | |||
|last=Feynman, R.P. | |||
|year=2005 | |||
|title=] | |||
|volume=2 |pages= | |||
|publisher=] | |||
|edition=2nd | |||
|isbn=978-0805390650 | |||
}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=February 2010}} is conserved. This is nothing other than the familiar electric charge.<ref> | |||
{{cite journal | |||
|last=Karatas |first=D.L. | |||
|last2=Kowalski |first2=K.L. | |||
|year=1990 | |||
|title=Noether's theorem for Local Gauge Transformations | |||
|url=http://ccdb4fs.kek.jp/cgi-bin/img/allpdf?198908224 | |||
|journal=] | |||
|volume=58 |issue=2 |pages=123–131 | |||
|doi=10.1119/1.16219 | |||
}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite journal | |||
|last=Buchholz |first=D. | |||
|last2=Doplicher |first2=S. | |||
|year=1986 | |||
|title=On Noether's Theorem in Quantum Field Theory | |||
|journal=] | |||
|volume=170 |issue=1 |pages=1–17 | |||
|doi=10.1016/0003-4916(86)90086-2 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
But what if there is a position-dependent (but not time-dependent) infinitesimal ] <math>\delta \psi(\vec{x})=iq\alpha(\vec{x})\psi(\vec{x})</math> where α is some function of position? <!--Unencyclopedic tone, rephrase this--> | |||
The Noether charge is now | |||
:<math>\int d^3x \left</math> | |||
where <math>\vec{E}</math> is the ].<ref name=Buchholz1986/> | |||
Using ], | |||
:<math>\oint_{S^2} \alpha \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S} + \int d^3x \alpha\left</math> | |||
This assumes that the state in question approaches the vacuum asymptotically at spatial infinity. The first integral is the surface integral at spatial infinity and the second integral is zero by the ]. Also assume that ''α''(''r'',''θ'',''φ'') approaches ''α''(''θ'',''φ'') as ''r'' approaches infinity (in ]). Then, the Noether charge only depends upon the value of α at spatial infinity but not upon the value of ''α'' at finite values. This is consistent with the idea that symmetry transformations not affecting the boundaries are gauge symmetries whereas those that do are global symmetries. If ''α''(''θ'',''φ'') = 1 all over the ''S''<sup>2</sup>, we get the electric charge.<!--Rephrase--> But for other functions, we also get conserved charges (which are not so well known).<ref name=Buchholz1986/> | |||
This conclusion holds both in classical electrodynamics as well as in quantum electrodynamics. If α is taken as the ], conserved scalar charges (the electric charge) are seen as well as conserved vector charges and conserved tensor charges. This is not a violation of the ] as there is no ].<ref> | |||
{{cite journal | |||
|last=Coleman |first=S. | |||
|last2=Mandula |first2=J. | |||
|year=1967 | |||
|title=All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix | |||
|journal=] | |||
|volume=159 |pages=1251–1256 | |||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRev.159.1251 | |||
}}</ref> In particular, for each direction (a fixed ''θ'' and ''φ''), the quantity | |||
:<math>\lim_{r\rightarrow \infty}\epsilon_0 r^2 E_r(r,\theta,\phi)</math> | |||
is a ] and a conserved quantity. Using the result that states with different charges exist in different ]s,<ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|last=Giulini |first=D. | |||
|year=2007 | |||
|title=Superselection Rules | |||
|url=http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00003585/01/SSR-QMC-NetVersion.pdf | |||
|work= | |||
|accessdate=2010-02-21 | |||
}}</ref> the conclusion that states with the same electric charge but different values for the directional charges lie in different superselection sectors.<ref name=Buchholz1986/> | |||
Even though this result is expressed in terms of a particular spherical coordinates with a given ], translations changing the origin do not affect spatial infinity. | |||
== Implication for particle behavior == | |||
The directional charges are different for an electron that has always been at rest and an electron that has always been moving at a certain nonzero velocity (because of the ]s). The conclusion is that both electrons lie in different superselection sectors no matter how tiny the velocity is.<ref name=Buchholz1986/> At first sight, this might appear to be in contradiction with ], which implies that the whole one-particle ] lies in a single superselection sector, but it is not because ''m'' is really the greatest lower bound of a continuous mass spectrum and eigenstates of ''m'' only exist in a ]. The electron, and other particles like it is called an '''infraparticle'''.<ref> | |||
{{cite journal | |||
|last=Buchholz |first=D. | |||
|year=1982 | |||
|title=The Physical State Space of Quantum Electrodynamics | |||
|journal=] | |||
|volume=85|pages=49 | |||
|doi=10.1007/BF02029133 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
The existence of the directional charges is related to ]s. The directional charge at <math>t=-\infty</math> and <math>t=\infty</math> are the same if we take the limit as ''r'' goes to infinity first and only then take the limit as ''t'' approaches infinity. If we interchange the limits, the directional charges change. This is related to the expanding electromagnetic waves spreading outwards at the speed of light (the soft photons). | |||
More generally, there might exist a similar situation in other ] besides QED. The name "infraparticle" still applies in those cases. | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
] | ] |
Revision as of 00:48, 22 February 2010
An infraparticle is an electrically charged particle and its surrounding cloud of soft photons—of which there are infinite number, by virtue of the infrared divergence of quantum electrodynamics. That is, it is a dressed particle rather than a bare particle. Whenever electric charges accelerate they emit Bremsstrahlung radiation, whereby an infinite number of the virtual soft photons become real particles. However, only a finite number of these photons are detectable, the remainder being below the measurement threshold.
The form of the electric field at infinity, which is determined by the velocity of a point charge, defines superselection sectors for the particle's Hilbert space. This is unlike the usual Fock space description, where the Hilbert space includes particle states with different velocities.
Because of their infraparticle properties, charged particles do not have a sharp delta function density of states like an ordinary particle, but instead the density of states rises like an inverse power at the mass of the particle. This collection of states which are very close in mass to m consist of the particle together with low-energy excitation of the electromagnetic field.
Noether's theorem for gauge transformations
In electrodynamics and quantum electrodynamics, in addition to the global U(1) symmetry related to the electric charge, there are also position dependent gauge transformations. Noether's theorem states that for every infinitesimal symmetry transformation that is local (local in the sense that the transformed value of a field at a given point only depends on the field configuration in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of that point), there is a corresponding conserved charge called the Noether charge, which is the space integral of a Noether density (assuming the integral converges and there is a Noether current satisfying the continuity equation).
If this is applied to the global U(1) symmetry, the result
- (over all of space)
is the conserved charge where ρ is the charge density. As long as the surface integral
at the boundary at spatial infinity is zero, which is satisfied if the current density J falls off sufficiently fast, the quantity Q is conserved. This is nothing other than the familiar electric charge.
But what if there is a position-dependent (but not time-dependent) infinitesimal gauge transformation where α is some function of position?
The Noether charge is now
where is the electric field.
Using integration by parts,
This assumes that the state in question approaches the vacuum asymptotically at spatial infinity. The first integral is the surface integral at spatial infinity and the second integral is zero by the Gauss law. Also assume that α(r,θ,φ) approaches α(θ,φ) as r approaches infinity (in polar coordinates). Then, the Noether charge only depends upon the value of α at spatial infinity but not upon the value of α at finite values. This is consistent with the idea that symmetry transformations not affecting the boundaries are gauge symmetries whereas those that do are global symmetries. If α(θ,φ) = 1 all over the S, we get the electric charge. But for other functions, we also get conserved charges (which are not so well known).
This conclusion holds both in classical electrodynamics as well as in quantum electrodynamics. If α is taken as the spherical harmonics, conserved scalar charges (the electric charge) are seen as well as conserved vector charges and conserved tensor charges. This is not a violation of the Coleman–Mandula theorem as there is no mass gap. In particular, for each direction (a fixed θ and φ), the quantity
is a c-number and a conserved quantity. Using the result that states with different charges exist in different superselection sectors, the conclusion that states with the same electric charge but different values for the directional charges lie in different superselection sectors.
Even though this result is expressed in terms of a particular spherical coordinates with a given origin, translations changing the origin do not affect spatial infinity.
Implication for particle behavior
The directional charges are different for an electron that has always been at rest and an electron that has always been moving at a certain nonzero velocity (because of the Lorentz transformations). The conclusion is that both electrons lie in different superselection sectors no matter how tiny the velocity is. At first sight, this might appear to be in contradiction with Wigner's classification, which implies that the whole one-particle Hilbert space lies in a single superselection sector, but it is not because m is really the greatest lower bound of a continuous mass spectrum and eigenstates of m only exist in a rigged Hilbert space. The electron, and other particles like it is called an infraparticle.
The existence of the directional charges is related to soft photons. The directional charge at and are the same if we take the limit as r goes to infinity first and only then take the limit as t approaches infinity. If we interchange the limits, the directional charges change. This is related to the expanding electromagnetic waves spreading outwards at the speed of light (the soft photons).
More generally, there might exist a similar situation in other quantum field theories besides QED. The name "infraparticle" still applies in those cases.
References
- Schroer, B. (2008). "A note on infraparticles and unparticles". arXiv:0804.3563 .
- Kaku, M. (1993). Quantum Field Theory: A Modern Introduction. Oxford University Press. pp. 177–184, Appendix A6. ISBN 0195076524.
- ^ Buchholz, D. (1986). "Gauss' law and the infraparticle problem". Physics Letters B. 174: 331. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91110-X.
- Weyl, H. (1929). "Elektron und Gravitation I". Zeitschrift für Physik. 56: 330–352. doi:10.1007/BF01339504.
-
Noether, E.; Tavel, M.A. (transl.) (2005 ). "Invariant Variation Problems". arXiv:physics/0503066.
{{cite arXiv}}
:|class=
ignored (help); Check date values in:|year=
(help)CS1 maint: year (link)- Translation of Noether, E. (1918). "Invariante Variationsprobleme". Nachrichten von der Königlicher Gesellschaft den Wissenschaft zu Göttingen, Math-phys. Klasse: 235–257.
- Q is the integral of the time component of the four-current J by definition. See Feynman, R.P. (2005). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0805390650.
- Karatas, D.L.; Kowalski, K.L. (1990). "Noether's theorem for Local Gauge Transformations". American Journal of Physics. 58 (2): 123–131. doi:10.1119/1.16219.
- Buchholz, D.; Doplicher, S. (1986). "On Noether's Theorem in Quantum Field Theory". Annals of Physics. 170 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90086-2.
- Coleman, S.; Mandula, J. (1967). "All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix". Physical Review. 159: 1251–1256. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.159.1251.
-
Giulini, D. (2007). "Superselection Rules" (PDF). PhilSci Archive. Retrieved 2010-02-21.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|work=
- Buchholz, D. (1982). "The Physical State Space of Quantum Electrodynamics". Communication in Mathematical Physics. 85: 49. doi:10.1007/BF02029133.