Revision as of 04:27, 21 February 2010 editTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 edits →Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: endorse for CU attention← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:30, 22 February 2010 edit undoDominic (talk | contribs)Administrators29,558 edits checkedNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ||
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | |
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | checked }} <small>Requested by ] (]) 23:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC) </small> | ||
<!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | <!--## Replace CODE LETTER by the appropriate code letter and Replace No2ndLetter if you need a 2nd code letter (or leave it alone if not) ##--> | ||
<!--## Codeletters are: | <!--## Codeletters are: | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> | <!--## Make sure your evidence explains why CheckUser is appropriate ##--> | ||
{{Endorse}} ] (]) 04:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | {{Endorse}} ] (]) 04:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:{{confirmed}} along with Huetsen. Have reblocked another IP range. ]·] 11:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 11:30, 22 February 2010
Scibaby
Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/1
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/2
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/3
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.
Report date February 20 2010, 23:52 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- BC Builder (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Prolog
A common Scibaby pattern. Prolog (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Prolog (talk) 23:52, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 04:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Confirmed along with Huetsen. Have reblocked another IP range. Dominic·t 11:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Category: