Misplaced Pages

Vehicular homicide: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:38, 26 February 2010 editHeyitspeter (talk | contribs)4,115 edits →Sentencing← Previous edit Revision as of 04:51, 26 February 2010 edit undoAgradman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,981 edits experimenting with {{subst:U.S. state jurisdictions}}Next edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
Some states, such as ], have statutes allowing for a charge of a vehicular homicide if an unborn child is killed or injured by a motorist.<ref name="Minnesota">{{cite web|url=http://www.dps.state.mn.us/ots/crashdata/2003%20Impaired%20Facts/IDF03FLawOverviewVer10.pdf|format=PDF|publisher=Minnesota Department of Public Safety|title=A Brief Overview of Minnesota’s DWI Laws: Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169A and Related Laws|author=James Cleary and Joseph Cox|work=Minnesota Impaired Driving Facts Report}}</ref> Some states, such as ], have statutes allowing for a charge of a vehicular homicide if an unborn child is killed or injured by a motorist.<ref name="Minnesota">{{cite web|url=http://www.dps.state.mn.us/ots/crashdata/2003%20Impaired%20Facts/IDF03FLawOverviewVer10.pdf|format=PDF|publisher=Minnesota Department of Public Safety|title=A Brief Overview of Minnesota’s DWI Laws: Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169A and Related Laws|author=James Cleary and Joseph Cox|work=Minnesota Impaired Driving Facts Report}}</ref>


== Vehicular homicide by state == =={{PAGENAME}} in U.S. state jurisdictions==
<!--This section was automatically generated by inserting the text {{subst:U.S. state jurisdictions}}. Learn more about this template at http://en.wikipedia.org/Template:U.S._state_jurisdictions. -->
{{Expand-section|date=January 2007}}
{{MultiCol}}
=== Georgia ===
* ]
In the state of ], vehicular homicide is more properly known as '''homicide by vehicle'''. It is defined, by statute, that unlawful killing of another person using a vehicle. It does not require ], an intent to kill, nor does it require ] or ].<ref name=Trapp>{{cite web|url=http://www.topgun-lawyer.com/veh_homicide.htm|title=Vehicular Homicide Laws|author=Allen M. Trapp, Jr., P.C.|year=2004}}</ref>
* ]

* ]
There are two degrees of vehicular homicide:
* ]
;First degree homicide by vehicle:This is a ], that upon conviction will result in a sentence of between 3 and 15 years of ] (or between 5 and 20 years for habitual violators), with no parole for at least 1 year. A homicide is first degree homicide by vehicle if the driver "unlawfully met or overtook a school bus; unlawfully failed to stop after a collision; was driving ]; was driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs; failed to stop for, or otherwise was attempting to flee from a law enforcement officer; or had previously been declared a habitual violator".<ref name=Trapp />
* ]
;Second degree homicide by vehicle: This is a ], that upon conviction will result in a sentence of up to 1 year (which may be suspended) or a fine of up to US$1,000 (or both). Second degree homicide by vehicle encompasses all other homicides by vehicle, involving any other violation of the laws governing motor vehicles, that are not classed as first degree homicides.<ref name=Trapp />
* ]

* ]
=== Louisiana ===
* ]
In the state of ], vehicular homicide is defined as the killing of a human being while operating a motor vehicle, or other means of conveyance, under the influence of alcohol and/or controlled substances. The minimum punishment is a fine of at least $2,000 (not more than $15,000), and 2-30 years in prison.
* ]

* ]
=== Minnesota ===
{{ColBreak}}
In the state of ], vehicular homicide is one of the six levels of '''criminal vehicular operation''', and is defined as causing the death of a person, that does not constitute murder or manslaughter, as a result of operating a motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner, or in a negligent manner while in violation of the ] law, or where the driver flees the scene in violation of the felony fleeing law.<ref name="Minnesota" /> Vehicular homicide in Minnesota requires, at a minimum, a mens rea of gross negligence.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/statutes/?id=609.21 |title=609.21 Criminal Vehicular Homicide and Injury |publisher=Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota |year=2008 |accessdate=2009-02-10}}</ref>
* ]

* ]
=== Oregon ===
* ]
In the state of ], there is one statute that has "vehicular homicide" in the title. That is "Aggravated vehicular homicide," ORS 163.149.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/163.html|title=Oregon Revised Statutes|publisher=Oregon State Legislature|accessdate=2009-02-10}}</ref> People can be and are prosecuted for vehicular homicides under the already existing Manslaughter and Criminally Negligent Homicide statutes. Additionally, there is a special statute that elevates the crime seriousness of Manslaughter I and Criminally Negligent Homicide when it is caused by a drunk driver. ORS 163.147. When victims survive, prosecutors frequently charge defendants with serious assaults by means of a dangerous weapon (to wit: a vehicle). Oregon has a special law commonly referred to as "Measure 11" which subjects first time offenders to harsh mandatory minimum sentences. ORS 137.700. Manslaughter I carries a mandatory ten year sentence, even for a first time conviction. Manslaughter II carries 75 months, approximately 6 1/4 years. Therefore, drivers charged with causing someone's death recklessly (Man II) or recklessly, under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life (Man I), are facing very serious charges with very serious prison time.
* ]

* ]
Current law requires the State to prove at least criminal or gross negligence to get a conviction. Criminally negligent homicide requires the State to prove criminal negligence. Manslaughter II requires the State to prove recklessness. Manslaughter I requires the State to prove recklessness, under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life. This means it is up to the jury to decide, when a driver kills someone, whether the driver was just ordinarily negligent, making a simple driving mistake that anyone might make (and therefore not guilty of a crime but perhaps liable for civil damages), or whether the driver was grossly negligent or worse (and therefore guilty of a crime).
* ]

* ]
Some civil lawyers and relatives of those killed by negligent drivers are pushing for new legislation.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.katu.com/news/19961609.html |title=Dad's death prompts daughters to push for change |publisher=Fisher Communications |work=KATU |date=20 November 2008 (updated) |accessdate=2009-02-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cache:o76HIWNkYmsJ:news.opb.org/article/2289-new-vehicular-homicide-law-proposed-oregon/+new-vehicular-homicide-law-proposed-oregon&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us |title=Proposed Law Would Create Crime Of Vehicular Homicide In Oregon |accessdate=}}{{dead link|date=February 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.katu.com/news/19669639.html |title=Widow of slain bicyclist presses for new laws |publisher=Fisher Communications |work=KATU |date=20 November 2008 (updated) |accessdate=2009-02-10}}</ref> Lonny Friberg, 62, of ], was killed by a careless driver on March 18, 2008. His eldest daughter Erika is fighting for a new law called "A Law For Lonny" that would change the existing law in Oregon.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://alawforlonny.com |title=A Law for Lonny |publisher=(private individual) |date=28 July 2008 |accessdate=}}</ref> The intention is to provide a method of prosecution in situations where the driver at fault was not intoxicated (as Oregon's current negligent homicide law would cover this circumstance). More specifically, it would define a vehicle as a potentially deadly weapon, something Oregon law does not currently recognize.
* ]

* ]
=== ] State ===
* ]
:RCW 46.61.520 Vehicular homicide — Penalty.
{{ColBreak}}

* ]
::(1) When the death of any person ensues within three years as a proximate result of injury proximately caused by the driving of any vehicle by any person, the driver is guilty of vehicular homicide if the driver was operating a motor vehicle:
* ]

* ]
:::a While under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, as defined by RCW 46.61.502; or
* ]
:::b In a reckless manner; or
* ]
:::c With disregard for the safety of others.
* ]

* ]
::(2) Vehicular homicide is a class A felony punishable under chapter 9A.20 RCW, except that, for a conviction under subsection (1)(a) of this section, an additional two years shall be added to the sentence for each prior offence as defined in RCW 46.61.5055.
* ]

* ]
=== Wisconsin ===
* ]
In the state of ], ]s may be convicted of the negligent operation of a vehicle. Under Wisconsin law, a corporation can be held liable for the actions of its employees even when the employee is expressly instructed not to perform those actions by the employer.<ref>{{cite book|pages=68&ndash;70;|chapter=3. Components of a crime VII. Vicarious and corporate liability|title=Criminal Law & Procedure for the Paralegal: A Systems Approach|author=James W. H. MacCord and Sandra L. MacCord|year=2001|publisher=Thomson Delmar Learning|isbn=0766819655}}</ref>
{{ColBreak}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{ColBreak}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{EndMultiCol}}{{z22}}


== In other countries == == In other countries ==

Revision as of 04:51, 26 February 2010

Template:Globalize/USA Template:FixBunching

Part of a series on
Homicide
Murder

Note: Varies by jurisdiction

Manslaughter
Non-criminal homicide

Note: Varies by jurisdiction

Family
Other

Template:FixBunching

Criminal law
Elements
Scope of criminal liability
Severity of offense
Inchoate offenses
Offense against the person
Sexual offenses
Crimes against property
Crimes against justice
Crimes against the public
Crimes against animals
Crimes against the state
Defenses to liability
Other common-law areas
Portals

Template:FixBunching

Vehicular homicide (also known as vehicular manslaughter) in most states in the United States, is a crime. In general, it involves death that results from the negligent operation of a vehicle, or more so a result from driving whilst committing an unlawful act that does not amount to a felony. In the Model Penal Code there is no separate category of vehicular homicide, and vehicular homicides that involve negligence. Both are included in the overall category of negligent homicide. It can be compared to the offence of dangerous driving causing death in other countries.

All states except Alaska, Montana, and Arizona have vehicular homicide statutes. The laws have the effect of making a vehicle a potentially deadly weapon, to allow for easier conviction and more severe penalties. In states without such statutes, defendants can still be charged with manslaughter or murder in some situations.

The victim may be either a person not in the car with the offending motorist, such as a pedestrian, cyclist, another motorist, or a passenger in the vehicle with the offender.

There are proposals in other countries to adopt the single nomenclature of "vehicular homicide" as it is used in the United States.

Sentencing

A study by professors at Dartmouth College and Harvard University found that those convicted of vehicular homicide are given, on average, shorter sentences than those found guilty of other types of homicide. The study found that the gender of the offender does not statistically affect the length of the sentence, but the race does. The identity of the victim is a more important predictor of sentencing length, with longer sentences given to offenders in cases where the victim was female and/or had no violent criminal record.

Some states, such as Minnesota, have statutes allowing for a charge of a vehicular homicide if an unborn child is killed or injured by a motorist.

Vehicular homicide in U.S. state jurisdictions

Template:MultiCol

| class="col-break " |

| class="col-break " |

| class="col-break " |

| class="col-break " |

Template:EndMultiColTemplate:Z22

In other countries

In the United Kingdom, there is no offence of "vehicular homicide". The offences are "causing death by dangerous driving" and "causing death by careless driving whilst unfit through alcohol/over prescribed limit", under the Road Traffic Act 1988. This act removed the offence of "reckless driving" as the concept of recklessness in law requires a mens rea that was often difficult to prove in court. Additional offences connected to fatal road collisions were enacted in the Road Safety Act 2006 but have yet to be brought into force. Legal reformists have pressed for the adoption of a categorization more akin to that of the United States. Jeremy Clarkson, an advocate of a vehicular homicide offence, opines that whilst people's perceptions are that death resulting from a motor vehicle is in a different "family" to other killings, "in terms of fault there can be little distinction between those who kill through the dangerous operation of their cars and those who kill with machines, trains, etc.".

Famous people convicted

References

  1. John M. Scheb II and John Malcolm Scheb (2001). An Introduction to the American Legal System. Thomson Delmar Learning. p. 120. ISBN 0766827593.
  2. Michael Hooper, M. A. Dupont-Morales, and Judy H. Schmidt (2001). Handbook of Criminal Justice Administration. Marcel Dekker. p. 177. ISBN 0824704185.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. "The Facts: Vehicular Homicide and the Impaired Driver". United States Department of Transportation. Retrieved 2009-02-10.
  4. ^ Glaeser, Edward L. and Sacerdote, Bruce (2000). "The Determinants of Punishment: Deterrence, Incapacitation and Vengeance" ( – ). NBER Working Paper. 7676. {{cite journal}}: External link in |format= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. James Cleary and Joseph Cox. "A Brief Overview of Minnesota's DWI Laws: Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169A and Related Laws" (PDF). Minnesota Impaired Driving Facts Report. Minnesota Department of Public Safety.
  6. "c.52 §1". Road Traffic Act 1988. Office of Public Sector Information. 1988.
  7. C.M.V. Clarkson (2000). "Context and culpability in involuntary manslaughter: Principle or instinct?". In Andrew Ashworth and Barry Mitchell (ed.). Rethinking English Homicide Law. Oxford University Press. pp. 148–150, 164. ISBN 019829915X.
  8. MacTavish is free New York Times. May 15 2985. Accessed August 27 2007.
  9. Dany Heatley avoids jail time CBC Sports. February 4 2005. Accessed August 27 2007.
  10. Ex-Cowboys player sentenced to prison for hit-and-run deaths - Sports - Brief Article Jet. September 8 2003. Accessed August 27 2007.
  11. Smith, a former Celtic, gets a split verdict, abstract The New York Times. March 13 1992. Accessed August 27 2007.
  12. Fox News August 2 2007.

External links

Categories: