Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:12, 27 February 2010

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Archives
Archive 1 (August - October 2006)
Archive 2 (October 2006 - Dec 2006}
Archive 3 ( - July 2007)
Archive 4 (July - September 2007)
Archive 5 (September 2007-January 2008)
Archive 6 (January 2008-)
Archive 7 (from then to later)
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11 (April-May 2008)
Archive 12 (May - June 2008)
Archive 13
Archive 14
Archive 15
Archive 16

RuAF

I have Altered alot with that pages Misguided Information it has the T-60s canceled when it became the Pakda just how LFS became Pakfa and Mikoyan LMFS program Russia has 4000 aircraft 2200 are combat please im me i dont know how to give references which i have tons of or to contact you thank you so much (User:LMFS)

Forces of central subordination

I don't mind helping you out with this, but I should admit that the military terminology is not something I am very comfortable translating (I am capable of translating it, but I can't guarantee the quality of the output). However, I could supply the links to the articles about the populated places, if that helps you any. I wish I could help with the airports as well, but I don't really have anything to look them up properly, so it's going to be hit-or-miss there. Let me know what you want me to do.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:21, June 22, 2009 (UTC)

I've translated the portion you requested, but I want to once more re-emphasize that I wasn't very comfortable with the quality of my translation—it felt as if I was guessing, rather than knowledgeably translating, way too often. I hope the translation helps you get the idea of what all those facilities are, so you could then copy-edit it to conform with the established English military terminology. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:25, June 24, 2009 (UTC)

Vladimirsky Lager

Any time. Enjoy! I trust you'll be taking care of the army base portion from here?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:16, September 16, 2009 (UTC)

LMFS

Hey Thanks so much for everything can you make a page about the Russian Dozor 600 UAV its said to be a future UAV for Russia heres the link

http://theasiandefence.blogspot.com/2009/08/russias-newest-uav-at-maks-2009.html

you can also watch it on youtube thx :)

TUSC token b088c2c74706bfe6ef07cc0994df7ac3

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

3rd Guards MRD

Happy new year to you too (and I wish I could continue my holidays till January 14...)! I'll take a look at this some time later this week, if you don't mind. Are you working with the verbatim ru-wiki version, or is your version a mix? Just want to clarify how much fixing I should be doing :) Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:38, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay; truth be told, I forgot :( Anyway, it's done now, although I would recommend you proofread it one more time and copyedit as necessary. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:18, January 20, 2010 (UTC)

No worries

Happy new year! I have the resources to do something useful, I'm glad someone took notice of my work! yeah sure i will try and follow the guidelines, i'll see how i go? Buckshot06 are you upset the fact that New Zealand scrapped the combat types of your airforce? take it easy ;(User talk:Lovetravel86); 16:38, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Indian Air Force Vandalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_aircraft_of_the_Indian_Air_Force#Current_Aircraft

Could you please put a protection on this list of Indian Air Craft numbers, people keep editing with crazt numbers while providing NO source, and its allways differant numbers every day. one day its 330 mig-21s, the next its 400, then I edit it back to its REAL figure of 124, and some one edits 250. This is happening across the borad and the list is just readint totaly wrong. Now no-one can make any real sourced and up to date edits becuase bias people are determined to try and chage reality by edititng the list

thank you Rademire (talk) 10:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Russian Misplaced Pages

Looks like User:VasilievVV is still trying to revert every single edit concerning controversial administrator actions in Russian Misplaced Pages. Perhaps because he is one of the admins in RuWiki himself. SkyBon 15:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

• Hello, I'd like to discuss your edit if possible. I'm one of (horrible) Russian admins and I used to be on of the (terrible) arbitration committee members although I personally didn't take part in the rulings described. I think there are inaccuracies in your edit. While it is true that users had been blocked for behavior outside Misplaced Pages, I don't know any occasions when it was done "for critical blog comments about other Misplaced Pages users" unless you think that repeated abuse, name calling etc is a "critical comment". The admin/vandal story got lost in translation, too. She was desysoped mainly for repeated wheel-warring and the indefinitely blocked vandal having access to her computer and her knowledge of his accounts and passwords (similar circumstances weer sufficient for a desysop in Spanish Misplaced Pages) was just an icing on the cake. The "glass of water accident" did not involve an admin and had happened half a year later at a Wikiconference. Please, consider changing your edit. Thank you.--Victoria (talk) 21:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Would appreciate your look at this

Revision history of Battle of Debrecen -- Buckshot06, I'm unfortunately involved in a "revision war" in the Battle of Debrecen article. User Blabaaa insists on deleting an information footnote regarding casualties in the battle. I contend the footnote should remain as it points out how widely casualty claims can vary depending on source; user Blabaaa contends that is "Soviet fantasy" and should not be entered at all in Misplaced Pages in any form. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, and I may have violated the multiple revert rule -- but I can't even get the user to discuss the changes without it being reverted again. I think it is time for a third party to look at the issue as I don't see Blabaaa and I coming to agreement. Thanks, W. B. Wilson (talk) 07:27, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

first of all: he is writing something in a ref an put this behind figure of krivosheev this is simply wrong and should not be done. Blablaaa (talk) 07:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

can u explain me the value for the reader when he knows nonsense numbers of soviet era? i only see a attempte to mislead the reader. the article presents the reader numbers of "official" soviet books without marking them as sfi fi. so the reader without background will take them as serious "range" . please respond to this or delete the footnote.... Blablaaa (talk) 08:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

• "It lists both 1950s German and Soviet figures. "NOPE: he changed my refs i gave the numbers of "Das deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg Volume 8 (2007)". i refed the historian who used the numbers he changed to "official german" sources. Blablaaa (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

"There is no statement of authenticity intended" it should!!! because this soviet sources arent reliable, they imply that the "real casualties" are between the german and soviet sourcesBlablaaa (talk) 08:12, 27 February 2010 (UTC)