| Revision as of 17:22, 27 February 2010 editVerbal (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 edits →Abd: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:41, 28 February 2010 edit undoLirazSiri (talk | contribs)595 edits →Can't we all just get along?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Please ignore his reply. Your notification was polite and required. His comments are typical and show a continuation of his problematic behaviour. Best, <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 17:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | Please ignore his reply. Your notification was polite and required. His comments are typical and show a continuation of his problematic behaviour. Best, <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] <small>]</small></span> 17:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Can't we all just get along? == | |||
| Dear Sam, over the weekend I've taken a dispassionate look at this whole charade and have decided it really isn't worth getting upset over. It boggles my mind that a simple editorial dispute on which sections should be on a template could spawn so much unnecessary hostility and infighting on Misplaced Pages. I'm not even upset about your sudden interest in the TurnKey entry. I think your energies are misplaced but it doesn't really matter one way or another. Knock yourself out. In the meantime I'm encouraged that you have finally started to explain the reasoning behind various edits on the cloud computing template. That's a step in the right direction. I think it should be possible for editors to disagree with each other without all hell breaking loose. Best case scenario we put egos aside and find our way to common ground. Worst case scenario you make your arguments, I make mine and we let someone else decide. There's no reason to get upset or take any of it personally, especially on something that is so new and loosely defined as cloud computing. No hard feelings. Have a nice day. Cheers. ] (]) 04:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:41, 28 February 2010
Abd
Please ignore his reply. Your notification was polite and required. His comments are typical and show a continuation of his problematic behaviour. Best, Verbal chat 17:22, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Can't we all just get along?
Dear Sam, over the weekend I've taken a dispassionate look at this whole charade and have decided it really isn't worth getting upset over. It boggles my mind that a simple editorial dispute on which sections should be on a template could spawn so much unnecessary hostility and infighting on Misplaced Pages. I'm not even upset about your sudden interest in the TurnKey entry. I think your energies are misplaced but it doesn't really matter one way or another. Knock yourself out. In the meantime I'm encouraged that you have finally started to explain the reasoning behind various edits on the cloud computing template. That's a step in the right direction. I think it should be possible for editors to disagree with each other without all hell breaking loose. Best case scenario we put egos aside and find our way to common ground. Worst case scenario you make your arguments, I make mine and we let someone else decide. There's no reason to get upset or take any of it personally, especially on something that is so new and loosely defined as cloud computing. No hard feelings. Have a nice day. Cheers. LirazSiri (talk) 04:41, 28 February 2010 (UTC)