| Revision as of 01:17, 2 March 2010 editC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,596 edits uw-vandalism4im | Revision as of 01:20, 2 March 2010 edit undoC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,596 edits specific exampleNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Kelvin Goertzen|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ]. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> —''']''' (]) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you ] Misplaced Pages again{{#if:Kelvin Goertzen|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ]. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> —''']''' (]) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *Specific case in point: improperly relinked dates; dates should not be linked per the MOS. I do not see a need for blanket reversion, especially if the editor in question is not blocked. —''']''' (]) 01:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:20, 2 March 2010
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did to Kelvin Goertzen, you will be blocked from editing. You appear to be undoing legitimate changes. I suggest you explain these edits before you make any more. —C.Fred (talk) 01:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- Specific case in point: this edit improperly relinked dates; dates should not be linked per the MOS. I do not see a need for blanket reversion, especially if the editor in question is not blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)