Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Chris Langdell regarded the elucidation of legal truth as a scientific enterprise. By a method of socratic enquiry, he believed that truth would emerge in the manner that succesful biological forms survive across time by a process of natural selection. In this he foreshadows Karl Popper. It is well known that Langdell's Pragmatism was influenced by Darwinian ideas. All of this is very contrary to the notion that he was stuck inside some outmoded sixteenth century rationalism. On the contrary his ideas were very modern and progressive and his case method is the very antithesis of dogmatism. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Chris Langdell regarded the elucidation of legal truth as a scientific enterprise. By a method of socratic enquiry, he believed that truth would emerge in the manner that succesful biological forms survive across time by a process of natural selection. In this he foreshadows Karl Popper. It is well known that Langdell's Pragmatism was influenced by Darwinian ideas. All of this is very contrary to the notion that he was stuck inside some outmoded seventeenth century rationalism. On the contrary his ideas were very modern and progressive and his case method is the very antithesis of dogmatism. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
"However, Langdellianism failed to keep pace with rapid social change in the beginning of the century due to its insistence on timeless principles. It became less relevant as a swiftly changing polity required a new legal architecture and jurisprudential modality to develop rules more consonant with the reality of legal process. The notion that sixteenth century legal decisions would continue to govern life in the post-industrial world could simply not be sustained."
That sounds like opinion. The fact that Langdell's theories became less popular should be enough, the requirements of a polity for various forms of legal architecture and jurisprudential modality is hardly so rigorously established that it qualifies as encyclopedic knowledge. If someone is quoted as saying something, that would be a fact that could be noted.
TGGP (talk) 03:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
contradictory and misleading
Chris Langdell regarded the elucidation of legal truth as a scientific enterprise. By a method of socratic enquiry, he believed that truth would emerge in the manner that succesful biological forms survive across time by a process of natural selection. In this he foreshadows Karl Popper. It is well known that Langdell's Pragmatism was influenced by Darwinian ideas. All of this is very contrary to the notion that he was stuck inside some outmoded seventeenth century rationalism. On the contrary his ideas were very modern and progressive and his case method is the very antithesis of dogmatism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.106.115.153 (talk) 17:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
