Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:21, 11 March 2010

First of all, the complain that generated my block:

History of my edits:

1.

The original version said that John Hunyadi, Matthias Corvinus' father was Cuman. The reference was a site, where there isn't even written the word "Cuman": http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10066b.htm

I modified his ethnicity to "Romanian", giving as source Britannica.

2. I corrected phrase, because, as current version says "Most neutral and Romanian historians consider he is of Romanian descent.". There are aslo Hungarian sources that say he was Rom.

3. I changed Romanian name into HUNGARIAN name (it seems I am very xenophobic)

4. My changes on the page Treaty of Trianon

A. I added USA in the list of signatories of the treaty, based on the treaty text
B. I modified the no of cities lost by Hun. (from 10 to 6) ,based on Enyclopedia Britannica data

5. I corrected the length of Mures River http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Mure%C5%9F_River&action=historysubmit&diff=337954695&oldid=337775408

Iaaasi

Hi again. I'm facing an issue of some urgency and scope, which has gone unnoticed - I consider referring it through the usual channels, but this is beyond AN/I and I can't for the love of me figure out how we're supposed to be filing out new sockpuppet investigations. User:Iaaasi, who made himself known primarily for this monstrosity, edits to weed out all references to dual citizenship for some Romanians and Hungarians, various forms of xenophobic edit warring, all sorts of inflammatory rants on talk pages, and his almost instant familiarity with the subtleties of wikipedia, is almost certainly our old friend Bonnie. As Michael put it: Do you remember the time... If you can offer some advice on how to handle this, one way or another, please assist. Dahn (talk) 22:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked. bogdan (talk) 16:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

1. I was accused, based on the ortographic similarity between the usernames "iaaasi" and "Iasi" that my account is a sockpuppet of User:Iasi

• False, because i have many id-s wih this name; one example: the youtube acoount http://www.youtube.com/user/iaaasi, created in 2007
  

My ip id from Craiova, not from Iasi

2.I was said to be famous for "edits to weed out all references to dual citizenship for some Romanians and Hungarians"

• False, because I only reverted only a 2-3 edits of the user Rokarudi, who was engaged in an edit war on this subject and started modifying Romanian biographies after others reverted his edits on Hungarian biographies. When I uderstood the problem I stopped reverting.

Example:
original:
after 1st edit by Rokarudi:
after my revert to original:

3. I was accused of anti-Hungarian behaviour

• False, because

I. I added the German and HUNGARIAN names for Timisoara and for CFR Cluj
II. I corrected the description of a Dutch map representing Hungarian settlements in 12th century and modern Romanian ethnographic zones from Transylvania (and not "Hungarians and Romanians in 12th century Trasylvania" as it was suggested before)

I also replaced the map with its English version (which was meanwhile deleted) ,even if its content was against my "anti-hungarian" interests

III. I commented about a fancy map of Romania

V. I created a really inappropriate xenophobic profile page when I was angry on the Hungarians users:
- Nmate, who asked to be blocked, even if my assumed edit-war enemy recognized that my edits were made in good faith
- Squash Racket (in this case maybe without reason))

I also deleted it after a single day (it wasn't anyway accordind to my fellings for Hungarians)
4. I made many constructive edits:

• I reverted vandalism on Hungarian pages
  
• 
  
• I corrected Matthias Corvinus' ethnicity : "the second son of John Hunyadi, a successful military leader of Hungarian and Cuman descent" before my edits to "the second son of John Hunyadi, a successful Hungarian General probably of Romanian descent" now

• I corrected wrong link

5.

Hi Iaassi, I regret you have been blocked. I do not agree with the decision, although your last userpage edit was a bit sharp. I always appreciated that you edited in a straigtforward way, and did not disguise your real opinion behind artificial argumentations on wikipedia guidelines in a lawyer's style. I do not agree with some of our friends who hold you spread hatred, I think you are really interested in Hungarian history, culture and tried to understand the motivation of Hungarian editors. I think you are just a bit hot-headed and should think twice before pushing the enter button (sometimnes so should I), otherwise, you can be easily misunderstood. La revedere, baráti üdvözlettel: User: Rokarudi --Rokarudi 19:35, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I will bring more arguments if necessary

Blocked your IP

Please appeal your blocks on your own talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)