Misplaced Pages

User:Keithbob/Didn'tHearThat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Keithbob Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:34, 11 March 2010 editKeithbob (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers47,111 edits m← Previous edit Revision as of 13:36, 11 March 2010 edit undoKeithbob (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers47,111 edits addNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


*SexySadie--BigWeeBoy, Littleolive oil and Keithbob, repeatedly answer his question about how the section was amended via Talk Page, Sandbox and Consensus but instead he continues to badger BigWeeBoy and others about it. *SexySadie--BigWeeBoy, Littleolive oil and Keithbob, repeatedly answer his question about how the section was amended via Talk Page, Sandbox and Consensus but instead he continues to badger BigWeeBoy and others about it.

Before I add it back I just want to make sure that no one engaged in this discussion still has any objections that haven't been addressed. I wouldn't want to come back to this article in 2011 and find that it's been removed again without explanation. Anyone who thinks it's an unimportant detail should be ready to defend seemingly less important details now in the article. Will Beback talk 02:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:36, 11 March 2010

Under Construction

On various occasions WillBebacks passion for his POV has prevented him from hearing what other editors are repeatedly telling him

  • SexySadie--BigWeeBoy, Littleolive oil and Keithbob, repeatedly answer his question about how the section was amended via Talk Page, Sandbox and Consensus but instead he continues to badger BigWeeBoy and others about it.

Before I add it back I just want to make sure that no one engaged in this discussion still has any objections that haven't been addressed. I wouldn't want to come back to this article in 2011 and find that it's been removed again without explanation. Anyone who thinks it's an unimportant detail should be ready to defend seemingly less important details now in the article. Will Beback talk 02:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)