Misplaced Pages

Perverted-Justice: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:38, 12 January 2006 editLtPowers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,800 edits →Further reading: Moved links around for organization and clarity.← Previous edit Revision as of 02:35, 14 January 2006 edit undo64.34.168.70 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 79: Line 79:
* *
*, a website critical of PeeJ and their methodology *, a website critical of PeeJ and their methodology
*, a website critical of C-J.com and ''their'' methodology *, a website critical of C-J.com and ''their'' methodology
===Specific articles=== ===Specific articles===
*, updated January 2005 *, updated January 2005

Revision as of 02:35, 14 January 2006

File:Perverted Justice screenshot-5-18-2005.jpg
Screenshot of the Perverted Justice website

Perverted-Justice.com (also known as PeeJ) is an organization based in Portland, Oregon dedicated to identifying adults online seeking to have sexual encounters with minors in chat rooms. These adults frequently divulge information about themselves in an attempt to meet the child offline. PeeJ consists of around 30 adult volunteers who carry out sting operations by posing as minors in chat rooms. The volunteers set up profiles using usernames and pictures appropriate to such roles with the intent of attracting adults to approach them in chat rooms. After obtaining identifying information from these adults, who may offer their telephone numbers and other details in an attempt to arrange an offline meeting, PeeJ places the information, including their first names, telephone numbers, city of residence, photographs, and records of the sexual conversations on the PeeJ website.

Set up in 2002 by an Oregon man, Phillip John Eide, who uses the pseudonym Xavier Von Erck, the organization documents that its online operations have led to the exposure of over 757 people and the convictions of 32 as of December 17, 2005. Eide is also credited with locating a 14-year-old girl who was kidnapped, raped, and tortured by a 47-year-old man she met online.

PeeJ has been criticized by the U.S. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), among others. Tina Schwartz, NCMEC director of communication, has said: "It's really not the safest, most effective way to combat this problem ... From what I've seen ... they embarrass the people, but I don't know that complete justice is ever served," (Roanoke Times, 22 January 2005). On the other side, PeeJ has been publicly thanked by Port Huron police chief William J. Corbett .

Eide, who said he got the idea for the website while watching men attempt to groom young girls in chat rooms in Oregon, says that PeeJ is a computer watchdog agency that works closely with law-enforcement agencies. "The media likes to use the term 'vigilante' because it gets attention, but we don't consider ourselves vigilantes. We cultivate cooperation with police and work within the law to get justice, not outside of the law."

Methods

PeeJ functions by supporting volunteers who act as bait in chat rooms where children and minors can typically be found. The administrators of the website say they don't initiate online contact with the men they pursue, and also refuse to act on tips from Internet users in order to reduce the risk that someone might use the website to take revenge. PeeJ also says it does not look for targets in adult chatrooms.

File:VonErck.jpg
Phillip John Eide, also known as Xavier Von Erck, owner of Perverted-Justice.com

If a man starts chatting to the volunteer and turns the conversation to sex, the volunteer attempts to persuade the man to divulge personal details, particularly a telephone number, ostensibly needed to verify the man's identity so that a meeting can be arranged.

In the past, around this point the chatlog and details would be published on the website. However, in December 2003, PeeJ set up its Information First program, in which interested police departments could contact PeeJ, and any "busts" made within that department's jurisdiction would be sent straight to them without being posted to the website. In the beginning of this program, PeeJ would not contact the police first, as officers were skeptical that PeeJ's information could be used in a court of law.

However, ever since July 2004 when they made their first conviction, PeeJ switched to a policy of cold calling local police with the information they obtained. If a government agency is interested (police, FBI, military CID, etc) then the chatlog and other information is not posted to the site until after a conviction has been reached.

In both their Information First program and their cold calling policy, only if the agency is not interested at all does a log appear on the site, under the chain of thought that if the government is not interested in pursuing action, then family members and neighbors should be informed. (Logs are also posted after the person has been convicted in a court of law.)

In such cases, using the telephone number, PeeJ volunteers do a reverse-directory check to obtain the man's name, as well as checking on the Web for any other information they can find about him. They then post his name, address, and photograph if he has supplied one, on the PeeJ website, as well as the chat log: a record of the conversation he had with the volunteer. PeeJ subsequently contacts the man's family, friends, neighbors, and employer to alert them to the website posting.

Volunteers also take part in what PeeJ calls "media busts," where men are invited to a house with the promise of a sexual encounter with a minor. When the man arrives, he is greeted by a local television news reporter. Peej teamed up with Dateline NBC in New York in November 2004 to conduct a large sting operation, or "group media bust," in which Dateline rented a house and wired it with hidden cameras, while PeeJ volunteers posed as minors in chat rooms, telling men who approached them that they were home alone. "Within hours there were men literally lining up at our door," Dateline reported. In two-and-a-half days, 18 men showed up at the house after making a date with a PeeJ volunteer.

On November 4, 2005, Dateline aired another special which featured perverted-justice volunteers catching child predators. Among the men who responded: an ER doctor, a special education teacher and a rabbi. (See David Kaye (rabbi))

The organization offers men who have been exposed the right of reply, allowing them either to defend or apologize for their actions, and posting their responses. The organization also occasionally removes information from the website if the target shows, for example, that he is receiving counseling.

All telephone numbers are removed from the main website pages after two months (though still available on PeeJ's forums) to avoid another case like that of the Milwaukee bank teller, reported by the Associated Press, who received a threatening phone call from a man who had obtained her number from the PeeJ website. The woman had never been online or even owned a computer, and was forced to change her number, which had previously been registered to the subject of a PeeJ sting.

Currently, PeeJ only operates within the United States but plans to expand into Canada.

Convictions

PeeJ's website documents 33 convictions for 2005 attributed to its sting operations (bringing its total to 40 convictions overall). These have led to successful prosecutions in Arkansas, four in California, Colorado, two in Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, three in New York, two in Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, two in Texas, four in Washington, and two in Wisconsin. Convictions have included disorderly conduct, indecently soliciting a child, attempting to entice a juvenile to travel with intent to engage in sexual act, transporting child pornography, which traveled across state lines via computer and hence are under interstate commerce juristiction, and possession and dissemination of child pornography.

The organization has formed relationships with local police agencies around the U.S., and with the military police, who have proceeded with courts-martial on the basis of PeeJ chat logs.

PeeJ established its "Information First" police program in December 2003, in which local police departments make arrangements to have the chat logs handed to them for follow up before being posted on the PeeJ website, in order to safeguard potential prosecutions. Peej has also worked in conjunction with the ChildSeek Network, Counter Pedophilia Investigative Unit, and PoliceWorld.net.

In September 2004, Eide helped locate a 14-year-old girl from Camas, Washington, who had been missing from her foster home for almost two weeks. Local detectives were unable to follow leads on the girl's computer, citing lack of knowledge and resources. The girl's mother believed the computer might hold the key to the girl's location and contacted Eide, who noticed that the girl had logged in several times to her Yahoo! account, only to log out again. Eide was able to obtain the IP address of the computer the girl had logged in from; using this, the Internet Service Provider located the address. When police arrived at the house, they found the girl half-naked and lying in the foetal position, with her hair cut and dyed, in a darkened room containing a video camera and restraining devices. She had met her 47-year-old kidnapper, who was raping her when the police knocked on the door, in a chat room. He was subsequently charged with child rape and unlawful imprisonment.

Criticism

Scott Morrow of Corrupted-Justice.com, a website set up to challenge PeeJ, told ABC News there is currently no way to hold PeeJ accountable for mistakes. "When you're running an organization or running a group of people with the potential to do as much damage to people's lives as this does, I think there also has to be some accountability." Accountability would take the form of legal action against the organization. However, the only known instance of legal action against PeeJ was an application for a restraining order, issuing out of a complaint of harassment, against two PeeJ volunteers in Minnesota. The judge found the suit entirely without merit for reasons of jurisdictional issues, the matter of unenforceability, and because it was found that no harassment by Perverted-Justice.com volunteers took place.

Lee Tien, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is quoted as being concerned that PeeJ could send real predators into hiding . PeeJ's response is that this is in fact their goal, to have real predators hide away from the places that kids go. Eide likens this to putting up a Community Watch sign at a local playground, which could be argued to discourage predators from kidnapping children there. Tien also argued that chat transcripts can be easily doctored. In order to bolster credability, PeeJ has implemented a number of safeguards to prevent this from happening, including routing all chats through an encrypted proxy server that mirrors the data. This system has held up in court.

Some law-enforcement agencies have also stated that, while they appreciate PeeJ's mission, they do not agree with some of its practices. In a December 2004 article in the New York Sun, Bradley Russ, the training director for the federal Internet Crimes Against Children Taskforce, which employs about 200 federal agents nationwide, said PeeJ's tactics sometimes run counter to their standards. For instance, Russ said, by accepting child pornography from their "busts" to bolster a potential legal case, PeeJ volunteers are themselves in possession of unlawful images. He said federal authorities have begun considering whether to seize PeeJ contributors' computers. "It's a noble effort gone too far," Russ told the newspaper. He also said the group can make it more difficult for law enforcement to prosecute cases they present because those cases can be considered tainted by entrapment claims.

Additionally, PeeJ replies that, "No officer we've worked with has bashed us. No officer who has made an arrest hand-in-hand with Perverted-Justice.com has raised a voice against us." Furthermore, they consider their methods to be far from entrapment, arguing that they initiate nothing, and instead wait for their target to come to them, a claim which has been agreed on by several courts. No case brought to court so far has had any complications with regards to entrapment claims.

As to the reports on child pornography, PeeJ states that when sent child pornography against their will, they "immediately report it to the police and without fail." Furthermore, every time this has happened has resulted in a conviction against the one sending the pornography, not against PeeJ.

References

Further reading

Web sites

Specific articles

Categories: