Misplaced Pages

Talk:Salt Spring Coffee: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:49, 23 January 2010 editDigitalC (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,270 edits UBC Salt Spring Coffee: cmt← Previous edit Revision as of 22:31, 30 March 2010 edit undoCtremewen (talk | contribs)22 edits Blanked the pageNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{oldafdfull| date = 19 July 2009 (UTC) | result = '''no consensus''' | page = Salt Spring Coffee Co. }}

{{WikiProject Food and drink|class=Start|importance=|Foodservice=yes |coffee=yes |auto = yes}}
{{WikiProject Canada|bc=yes|class=start|importance=low}}

==] Tagging==
This article talk page was automatically added with {{tl|WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under ] or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging ] -- ] (]) 11:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

== UBC Salt Spring Coffee ==

Didn't that one close down? I have no idea whether they're planning to reopen though, so I'm hesitant to alter the article. --<font color="#800517">]</font><font color="#F62217">]</font><font color="#C12267">]</font> 02:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
:This place has four (count 'em - ''four'') outlets, and is also sold on BC Ferries. Whoopee. How the hell is this notable in the slightest?? Misplaced Pages is not meant to be a place for corporate self-promotion, which is all that this is.] (]) 15:33, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
::I removed the notability tag. You are free to propose an action (deletion, merger, redirection) but since it passed afd a warning tag is not warranted. ] (]) 03:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
::A coffee shop with 4 outlets is notable if they are covered in multiple reliable sources, which this one has been. The controversy within the last year was covered extensively by the media. ] (]) 21:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:31, 30 March 2010