Revision as of 14:42, 7 April 2010 editDan Murphy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,045 edits c← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:42, 7 April 2010 edit undoDan Murphy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,045 edits ceNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Per , it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. ] (]) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | Per , it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. ] (]) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Well, you can " |
: Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...] (]) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:42, 7 April 2010
Per Delicious carbuncle's comments here, it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...Bali ultimate (talk) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)