Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for comment/Ash: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:42, 7 April 2010 editDan Murphy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,045 edits ce← Previous edit Revision as of 15:42, 7 April 2010 edit undo207.237.230.164 (talk) this Rfc is regarding Ash's BLP contributions and nothing more.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Per , it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. ] (]) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Per , it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. ] (]) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
: Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...] (]) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) : Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...] (]) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
::...while giving the finger with the other? The outcome of this RfC will pertain to the issues addressed in the Statement of the Dispute, and nothing more. Should more changes be desired, they should be addressed directly.

Revision as of 15:42, 7 April 2010

Per Delicious carbuncle's comments here, it seems plain that there are more issues being addressed here than have been laid out in this RfC. If Dc would like to address more issues than Ash's BLP contributions, they should be processed through the proper dispute resolution channels (i.e.: spelled out clearly in this Rfc, to start). Otherwise, this can be perceived as WikiHounding. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 14:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, you can "perceive" in one hand...Bali ultimate (talk) 14:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
...while giving the finger with the other? The outcome of this RfC will pertain to the issues addressed in the Statement of the Dispute, and nothing more. Should more changes be desired, they should be addressed directly.