| Revision as of 22:06, 3 April 2010 editI42 (talk | contribs)8,918 edits Undid revision 353798541 by I42 (talk) Sorry - meant to tag evilmaster23← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:50, 7 April 2010 edit undoC1k3 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers4,668 editsm shaking the etch a sketch....Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Welcome to ] == | |||
| Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, C1k3! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply ]. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other ], or you can post a message on ]. ''']''' 04:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Cheetos == | |||
| So you think Cheetos should be used for suicide attempts? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 19:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Michael Guy == | |||
| All is not lost; membership in a notable band is sufficient to be inelligible for speedy deletion; I removed the tag. It may still be deleted after ], but it's around now and if improved may survive an AFD challenge. ] 02:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The band has been deleted, you may wish to tag the album as well ]. Cheers, ] 04:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] is just an umbrella genre for various subgenres, such as ], ], ] and ]. Somewhat like ] is just an umbrella genre for ], ], ], ], etc. Jazz rock is a legitimate subgenre of jazz fusion, and therefore shall remain. (] 07:16, 14 August 2007 (UTC)) | |||
| ==Pop Mod: Need Some Insight== | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Pumpmeup | |||
| Seems this guy is throwing his weight around and threatning people with bans for edits that he cites as "vandalizm", could you back up his claims by looking at what he reverted for each, or is he abusing his power? Thanks in any case. I dont like being warned for something as mundane as ] | |||
| ] 08:42 AM November 28th 2007 <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:43, 4 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ultimate adventure.jpg== | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at ] carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] (]) 05:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==User Box== | |||
| Hey dude, I tweaked your user box. You had a syntax error in there that was messing up the rendering on your user page. Only thing that looks like it's not included is age. Feel free to leave, tweak, or revert if you like. - ]<sup>] | ]</sup> <small>—Preceding ] was added at 16:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ::NP, gotta look out for a fellow Washingtonian. - ]<sup>] | ]</sup> 16:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Personl attacks== | |||
| If you make any more personal attacks you will be blocked. ] ] 07:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I know, and it is by no means indicative of my general attitude toward dissension on Misplaced Pages. In this particular case, however, I apologize for nothing. ] (]) 07:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Your comments == | |||
| Incorrect, I see that you are 22 years of age. Wait until you become older! In any cause you failed to read all wiki policies. Furthermore speech has limits, being Jewish I am sure you will understand this <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :No, really ]. I'm really sorry if you don't like it, but that's the way it is. Also, sorry to C1k3 for responding on your talk page. --<font color="green">]</font> <small>(] - ])</small> 01:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::1st Policy, "Reasons for deletion include but are not limited content that does not belong in an encyclopedia. It is clear that this content would not be found in encyclopdia. 2nd,Misplaced Pages is not a directory." The current form of the article is nothing less than a stub of the word. 2 for starters. 3rd LAW, speech has limits, one is social good. This may be more advanced for some of the users on wiki as I am sure many have not studied law. Thright (talk) 01:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)thright <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I saw you tagged the above article for csd with the comment that "it is a vanity page". It is generally not a good idea to use the term "vanity" when describing articles about people for a couple of reasons. First, it is accusatory and discouraging and kind of ] to new users. Second, calling an article "vanity" could be a defamatory assertion unless you can clearly show they were responsible for it. Just some friendly advice. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! ] (]) 05:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Irish Evil == | |||
| You can blame a webcomic for this one: . -- ] (]) 02:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Why did you delete ]? == | |||
| *Why did you delete ]? cause i just don't understand. ]<span><font size="1">(])</font></span> 00:46, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == August 2008 == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from {{#if:Dark Star (film)|]|Misplaced Pages}}. When removing text, please specify a reason in the ] and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 07:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == 1/4 part Jewish == | |||
| how can u be a part of anything?! u are Jewish or ur not. u are human or ur not. ] (]) 19:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| whats ur race then? you don't believe that your skin color is ur race do u? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| u don't even know your own race is. your race is homo sapien. homo is man, sapien means wise. most people don't know there own race. now if u want to call your species Caucasian u can, but your kind, your race is homo sapien. all evolutionist are races. they all so morons to believe we evolved from rocks. it takes a lot of faith to believe in that. ```` <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| stop listening to evolutionists. they don't know what Kind and Species means. darwin's book is called origin of species ...... (a really long title) Species evolves but the Kind cannot. a Dog can only produce a Dog. the Dog is the Kind. the Scottie dog is the Species. it can produce another Scottie or something else. here watch this u might learn some truth. | |||
| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mni-SRtG7xY or | |||
| http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2528412371399195162 | |||
| im sure u wont. your a nazi. all ways has an excuse to do evil and be evil. your heart loves sin more then anything in the world. that's why u cant handle the true definition of evil. | |||
| evil: One who thinks of himself and put himself before others. | |||
| why: That is what you do when you commit sin, that is one of the reasons why they are sin. Everything happens for many reasons not for a reason. Only a child would think, say, and believe that.```` <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Glitch? == | |||
| One of your edits several comments. I've restored. ] ] ] 20:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == G1 tagging == | |||
| Hi there. Could I please remind you to tag pages for deletion under the G1 criteria only if they clearly meet the criteria? For example, ] should have been tagged as G10, not G1, because that would have given it a much higher priority on the deletion scale. Anyway, hopefully, you can tag things correctly next time. Thanks in advance. - <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="green">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="purple">]</font></sub> 04:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Eh? == | |||
| I'm not sure. I'm still pretty new to wikipedia. ] (]) | |||
| == On the now deleted ] == | |||
| Please don't ] the newbies. "Learn to spell, then we'll talk" isn't really an appropriate response to a request for assistance. ] (]) 10:01, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :How many times do you have to be told about this now?--] (]) 10:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I have removed the CSD and hangon tags-- a bit puzzled by the addition of both. Restored removed info box. In any event, this would seem to assert significance, ot even notability, and I would recommend a full discussion at ] prior to deletion. Cheers, ]] 20:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <sigh/>. ]] 20:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Nothing new since my last effort at coaching. Cheers, ]] 20:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| If you beleive in spelling and grammar so much why didn't you not place a comma before "and". | |||
| Cat oh I mispelled dog. :) Jdog555 did not write this. | |||
| :You only need to place a comma before "and" if you're listing more than three things. ] (]) 06:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Kewl, sorry cool. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Awww I was trying to mess with you. Just kidding *_* <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Invitation to , a focus group== | |||
| Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Misplaced Pages. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Misplaced Pages, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you. | |||
| I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Misplaced Pages in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated! | |||
| Willing and able to help us out? . Want to know more? Visit our . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! ] (]) 21:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == User talk:The Little Blue Frog == | |||
| Please don't indicate that you are going to over that. Thanks. ] ] ] 19:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Dec and Davis == | |||
| * Re: ], I've reposted my rationales from scratch for the benefit of a new person, so maybe we can restart the discussion on a better foot, since I still don't understand why the four words "Not unlike Ed Wood" would be worthy of declaring war on my talk page. | |||
| * Re: Miles Davis' "The Little Blue Frog", I have a proto-stub for it at the top of my user page (and some scholar documents that should help it pass ] and ], since separate articles about a single song are usually not allowed). If you should want to work on that or contribute sources/references, I think it would be a better use of our times. Regards, <span style="color:#00F">—</span> ] (]) 17:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thank you== | |||
| C1k3: thanks for the barnstar. I will polish it and display it discretely. Best wishes, ] (]) 03:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == C1k3: I find a descrepancy in your deleting my contribution. == | |||
| Why can I not create a page about me if I'm a well known person around my area? It doesn't make sense because everything I wrote was true, and as I'm about to enter a political office I am a relavent topic of interest to some people. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Easter == | |||
| What religious feast in the Christian liturgical year (the phrasing used in the article) is arguably more important than Easter? Nothing in the Roman Catholic year, nor the Eastern Orthodox year, nor on any liturgically-minded Protestant churches, that I'm aware of. ] (]) 12:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Shaving Cream | |||
| Well then remove the redirect of shaving gel to a new article, shaving gel and shaving foam have nothing to do with Shaving Cream. I am removing the shaving/gel from the article- we can go backwards and forwards for ever :-) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Speedily == | |||
| I tagged the article because 1. I don't know her :) And 2. Misplaced Pages was under a lot of vandalism at that time. I may have just roughly glanced through your article and thought it might be another "fake" article.{{Unsigned|Tyw7}} | |||
| == Warning Vandals == | |||
| ] Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made{{#if:| to ]}}: you may already know about them, but you might find ] useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the ]. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-warn --> -''']''' <sup><small>]</small></sup></span> 01:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Warning signs reply. == | |||
| I do accept if the page is in an early stage but when you come across something that can be solved, there's no need for like "this page has to be neutral" or "this page needs references". Believe me, I don't know anything about using those terms. If there's something that can't be solved like "the story is too long", you can put it in there so the editor knows what can be done so you can take that warning off. That is something you can learn from me, but I do appreciate your comments anyway and I'm open to solve anything at all and maybe learn something from it. ] (]) 00:11, 19 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Copyedits == | |||
| Thank you for your ] edits on '']'', but can you please take some time to familiarise yourself with the ] guideline. ] (]) 17:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] Hoax? == | |||
| What is there about ] that makes it a '''blatant and obvious''' hoax? Note that if one must do research to determine if something is a hoax, it is probably not blatant enough for speedy deletion. ] ] 06:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :IMO a lack of Google hits makes a hoax probable, but not blatant. i have removed the speedy tag. I will generally only accept a hoax speedy for an "article" that is clearly self-contradictory or absurd. (for example I deleted one recently that said the subject was born in 1996 but climbed Mount Everest at age 23, which would require a time machine.) If there is even a small chance that this is soemthing obscure bur true ] will do the job, IMO. ] ] 06:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == How is making an article that goes along with a joke a bad thing. == | |||
| You said, Wow, I don't even know where to begin, on the talk for Yu-gi-oh abridged, in response to my article. first off, I really have, in fact seen the series. I was making up a story and an article to go along with the joke on the episode where they say "according to Misplaced Pages, we don't exist." incase you didn't notice, other people have deleted articles on Misplaced Pages that claims that the series does exist, because it goes with the joke. May I ask you, what is wrong with making an article that does the opposite. | |||
| --] (]) 21:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)evilmaster23 | |||
| P.S. LK rules. | |||