Revision as of 02:51, 17 January 2006 editMONGO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers76,644 edits support, count← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:58, 17 January 2006 edit undoPiedras grandes (talk | contribs)296 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
#'''Support'''. My experience with him on the ] show him to be a knowledgeable, courteous editor who works well with others, and has helped several medical articles reach featured status. — ] ] 00:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Support'''. My experience with him on the ] show him to be a knowledgeable, courteous editor who works well with others, and has helped several medical articles reach featured status. — ] ] 00:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Support''' with no reservations.--] 02:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | #'''Support''' with no reservations.--] 02:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
#'''Support''' Can't hurt--] 02:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' |
Revision as of 02:58, 17 January 2006
Wouterstomp
(14/0/0) ending 14:50, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Wouterstomp (talk · contribs) – This user has been around since July and accumulated 2000 edits, 1500 of which to the article namespace (mainly but not solely his own field of medicine) with good involvement in community projects such as the medical collaboration of the week. His hard work, dedication and participation make me think he'd be an expert at handling the mop. JFW | T@lk 22:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I gladly accept the nomination. --WS 20:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Support
- Advanced life support. Nominator. JFW | T@lk 14:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support with pleasure. SlimVirgin 15:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support in the trenches --JWSchmidt 15:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. BDAbramson T 16:14, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Excellent choice for an admin. → P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 16:45, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- --Jaranda 17:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support good contributor to wikipedia, should make a good admin --TimPope 17:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Good editor, deserves the tools. -- DS1953 21:30, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- King of All the Franks 22:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Izehar 22:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. - Phædriel ♥ 23:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. My experience with him on the medicine collaboration of the week show him to be a knowledgeable, courteous editor who works well with others, and has helped several medical articles reach featured status. — Knowledge Seeker দ 00:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support with no reservations.--MONGO 02:51, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Can't hurt--Piedras grandes 02:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
- Edit summary usage: 100% for major edits and 80% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and and 150 minor edits outside the Misplaced Pages, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces. Mathbot 15:00, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- See information about Wouterstomp's edits with Interiot's edit count tool or Interiot's edit history tool.
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Misplaced Pages backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A. Mainly vandalism roll-back. Especially all the vandalism that slips through RC and ends up on my ever-growing watchlist (1500+ articles) with mostly medical pages, but also on recent changes.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. All work on the medicine collaboration of the week. It is really enjoyable to work together with other doctors, medical students and all other interested people to improve the quality of medical pages. Aside from that I also like to create new articles for obscure diseases and other medical topics that almost noone has ever heard of (the list of diseases still has far to much red links).
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A. I haven't been in any conflicts so far. I my experience most disagreements are usually easily solved on the talk pages, and I hope to keep it that way. If a conflict would arise, I would try to stay friendly and not be afraid to admit when I am wrong myself.