Revision as of 14:34, 9 April 2010 edit66.65.110.69 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:34, 9 April 2010 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 66.65.110.69 - ""Next edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WikiProject Australia|class=stub|importance=low}} | {{WikiProject Australia|class=stub|importance=low}} | ||
people keep reverting the good photos of julian to maximally bad, unrepresentatives ones claiming copyright violations which they are NOT. You can see how bad this is when there are two photos taken at a conference (new media days/copenhagen) within what appears to be seconds of each other, from the same camera, and the one that makes the speaker look dumb is picked, even though BOTH have been uploaded to wikipedia, one called "1" and the other called "2". | people keep reverting the good photos of julian to maximally bad, unrepresentatives ones claiming copyright violations which they are NOT. You can see how bad this is when there are two photos taken at a conference (new media days/copenhagen) within what appears to be seconds of each other, from the same camera, and the one that makes the speaker look dumb is picked, even though BOTH have been uploaded to wikipedia, one called "1" and the other called "2". <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
wot no article? I'm a bit surprised..... | wot no article? I'm a bit surprised..... |
Revision as of 14:34, 9 April 2010
Biography Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Australia Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||||||
|
people keep reverting the good photos of julian to maximally bad, unrepresentatives ones claiming copyright violations which they are NOT. You can see how bad this is when there are two photos taken at a conference (new media days/copenhagen) within what appears to be seconds of each other, from the same camera, and the one that makes the speaker look dumb is picked, even though BOTH have been uploaded to wikipedia, one called "1" and the other called "2". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.110.69 (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
wot no article? I'm a bit surprised.....
hmm it is surprising.. I'm not sure if it'd be entirely coincidental though.
<3 Julian Assange
hmmmmm...... Privatemusings (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Does sombody know the pronunciation of Assange? 134.245.5.104 (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- No reference here to Wikileaks! I don't know enough about him to 'be bold' and update, but if anyone does that is one glaring omission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sulvo (talk • contribs) 06:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)