| Revision as of 14:54, 15 April 2010 editFactomancer (talk | contribs)3,045 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:30, 15 April 2010 edit undoFactomancer (talk | contribs)3,045 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Unequal implementation of a supposedly bilateral interaction ban == | |||
| The ban clearly states: '''Repeated spurious reports to administrators using this mechanism shall be grounds for blocking for disruption.''' | |||
| The other party has made at least three spurious complaints about my behaviour to the admins, behaviour that did not involve any violations of the ban and did not result in any blocks. | |||
| * . | |||
| * . | |||
| * . | |||
| I, meanwhile, have been repeatedly blocked for merely mentioning the name of the other party in the ban and have been treated '''extremely harshly''' by the admins in question - Georgewilliamherbert and Sandstein. | |||
| So when I complained to the admin in question about all these spurious complaints and that they violated the "Repeated spurious reports" clause, '''I''' was blocked for "griping" by ]. '''This admin has a long history of persecuting me''' that you can read on my talk page. | |||
| So am I to accept that another user is allowed to '''continually criticize me, comment on my behaviour and accuse me''' but when I protest about it I am subject to being blocked? | |||
| This is a '''psychologically abusive situation''', and I don't think I will be able to continue to contribute to Misplaced Pages if I am to be the subject of continual accusations with no means to defend myself. I don't think anyone could and that this so-called interaction ban is being used as an ad hoc means to drive me off Misplaced Pages for good. | |||
| No doubt I will be blocked for a very long time by either Georgewilliamherbert or Sandstein for making this report, given how they use the ban to block me for anything they like, so this is probably going to be my final notice to Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Update: I was threatened with a community ban by Sandstein for complaining on ] for the terrible crime of criticizing the decision of the admins. I'm not the one banning people here. | |||
Revision as of 16:30, 15 April 2010
Unequal implementation of a supposedly bilateral interaction ban
The ban clearly states: Repeated spurious reports to administrators using this mechanism shall be grounds for blocking for disruption.
The other party has made at least three spurious complaints about my behaviour to the admins, behaviour that did not involve any violations of the ban and did not result in any blocks.
I, meanwhile, have been repeatedly blocked for merely mentioning the name of the other party in the ban and have been treated extremely harshly by the admins in question - Georgewilliamherbert and Sandstein.
So when I complained to the admin in question about all these spurious complaints and that they violated the "Repeated spurious reports" clause, I was blocked for "griping" by User:Georgewilliamherbert. This admin has a long history of persecuting me that you can read on my talk page.
So am I to accept that another user is allowed to continually criticize me, comment on my behaviour and accuse me but when I protest about it I am subject to being blocked?
This is a psychologically abusive situation, and I don't think I will be able to continue to contribute to Misplaced Pages if I am to be the subject of continual accusations with no means to defend myself. I don't think anyone could and that this so-called interaction ban is being used as an ad hoc means to drive me off Misplaced Pages for good.
No doubt I will be blocked for a very long time by either Georgewilliamherbert or Sandstein for making this report, given how they use the ban to block me for anything they like, so this is probably going to be my final notice to Misplaced Pages.
Update: I was threatened with a community ban by Sandstein for complaining on WP:ANI for the terrible crime of criticizing the decision of the admins. I'm not the one banning people here.