Misplaced Pages

Bishop Hill (blog): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:51, 15 April 2010 editGuettarda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators63,420 edits ital book title← Previous edit Revision as of 17:52, 15 April 2010 edit undoGuettarda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators63,420 edits Climate change advocacy: don't agree with the title, but at the very least it shouldn't be a proper nounNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
==Climate change advocacy== ==Climate change advocacy==


] writing for the ] on when the Parliamentary Committee investigating the ] published their findings said, sceptics on the website ridiculed the MPs' findings. One asked: "Is it April fools already?" With another commenting, "No-one with half a brain cell will view this conclusion as anything other than a hasty and not very subtle establishment cover-up." <ref name="Roger Harrabin ">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm|title=Climate science must be more open, say MPs|last=Harrabin |first=Roger |date=31 March 2010|publisher=news.bbc.co.uk|pages=1|language=English|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> ] writing for the ] on when the Parliamentary Committee investigating the ] published their findings said, sceptics on the website ridiculed the MPs' findings. One asked: "Is it April fools already?" With another commenting, "No-one with half a brain cell will view this conclusion as anything other than a hasty and not very subtle establishment cover-up." <ref name="Roger Harrabin ">{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm|title=Climate science must be more open, say MPs|last=Harrabin |first=Roger |date=31 March 2010|publisher=news.bbc.co.uk|pages=1|language=English|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref>


Bradly Fikes, a reporter for the ] wrote "The truth that the Greenpeace fanatics (and some at the New York Times) can’t process is that opposition to global warming alarmism is a decentralized guerrilla campaign against global warming extremism. There is no central command of large corporations directing anti-warmist blogs such as Watts Up With That?, or EUReferendum or Bishop Hill, etc" <ref name="Bradley Fikes">{{cite news|url=http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=8640|title=Greenpeace Thug Threatens Global Warming Skeptics “We know where you live”|last=Fikes|first=Bradley |date=April 4th, 2010|publisher=www.nctimes.com|pages=1|language=Engish|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> Bradly Fikes, a reporter for the ] wrote "The truth that the Greenpeace fanatics (and some at the New York Times) can’t process is that opposition to global warming alarmism is a decentralized guerrilla campaign against global warming extremism. There is no central command of large corporations directing anti-warmist blogs such as Watts Up With That?, or EUReferendum or Bishop Hill, etc" <ref name="Bradley Fikes">{{cite news|url=http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=8640|title=Greenpeace Thug Threatens Global Warming Skeptics “We know where you live”|last=Fikes|first=Bradley |date=April 4th, 2010|publisher=www.nctimes.com|pages=1|language=Engish|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref>

Revision as of 17:52, 15 April 2010

The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.
Find sources: "Bishop Hill" blog – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Bishop Hill
Type of siteBlog
Created byAndrew Montford
URLhttp://bishophill.squarespace.com/

Bishop Hill was founded on November 21, 2006 by Andrew Montford author of The Hockey Stick Illusion. At first focusing on british politics Montford, after following a link from a blog posted by Tim Worstall to Climate Audit turned his focus to Climate Change from a Skeptical Viewpoint. Montford`s layperson's explanations of the Hockey Stick debate have won wide acclaim specifically his summaries of posts from Climate Audit which he called "Caspar And The Jesus Paper"

Climate change advocacy

Roger Harrabin writing for the BBC on when the Parliamentary Committee investigating the Climategate controversy published their findings said, sceptics on the website ridiculed the MPs' findings. One asked: "Is it April fools already?" With another commenting, "No-one with half a brain cell will view this conclusion as anything other than a hasty and not very subtle establishment cover-up."

Bradly Fikes, a reporter for the North County Times wrote "The truth that the Greenpeace fanatics (and some at the New York Times) can’t process is that opposition to global warming alarmism is a decentralized guerrilla campaign against global warming extremism. There is no central command of large corporations directing anti-warmist blogs such as Watts Up With That?, or EUReferendum or Bishop Hill, etc"

Andrew Orlowski, writing for The Register after it was revealed Lord Oxburgh who had been choosen by the University of East Anglia to head its enquiry into Climategate, actually had a leading role in a global warming campaign network called Globe International. This was quickly picked up by climate skeptic blogs. With Bishop Hill writing "GLOBE - a vehicle for avoiding Freedom of information"

A post on the blog led to the resignation of Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature from the panel. In an interview with Chinese state radio when asked about the controversy, Campbell said that he believed nothing untoward had happened. The Guardian newspaper commented "The interview, posted on the Bishop Hill blog run by the climate sceptic Andrew Montford and shown on Channel 4 News, risked undermining Muir's claim that the inquiry team was impartial"

Comments and Criticism

Richard Littlemore writing on his DeSmogBlog said, "In a desperate effort to distract attention from the real issue, Steve McIntyre and one of his more loquacious acolytes (Bishop Hill) have renewed their attack on the fabled hockey stick" and finished his article with the question "Have you any legitimate criticism of all the other science that supports Mann's work? Any criticism at all?"

James Delingpole in his Telegraph blog wrote "Fortunately the great Bishop Hill has been doing some digging" when the blog found out that George Marshall, founder and director of projects at the Climate Outreach and Information Network had been funded to the tune of £700,000 over two years by DEFRA. He has also commented on his personal blog saying, "Bishop Hill has unearthed a jaw-dropping critique of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report. His post’s so delightful there’s no need for embellishment"

Anthony Watts wrote on his Watts Up With That blog of Bishop Hill, "let me say that he is a succinct and careful writer who has earned praise from many (including myself and Steve McIntyre)"

References

  1. ^ Montford, Andrew (Aug 11, 2008). "Caspar and the Jesus paper". bishophill.squarespace.com. Retrieved 14 April 2010. Cite error: The named reference "Andrew Montford" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  2. Ridley, Matt (3RD FEBRUARY 2010). "The global warming guerrillas". www.spectator.co.uk. Retrieved 9 April 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. Harrabin, Roger (31 March 2010). "Climate science must be more open, say MPs". news.bbc.co.uk. p. 1. Retrieved 12 April 2010.
  4. Fikes, Bradley (April 4th, 2010). "Greenpeace Thug Threatens Global Warming Skeptics "We know where you live"" (in Engish). www.nctimes.com. p. 1. Retrieved 12 April 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  5. Orlowski, Andrew (26th March 2010). "Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties". The Register. Retrieved 12 April 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  7. Littlemore, Richard (13 August 08). "This is not a hockey Stick" (in English (US)). www.desmogblog.com. Retrieved 12 April 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  8. Delingpole, James (November 25th, 2009). "Climategate: how they all squirmed". www.blogs.telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 12 April 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. Delingpole, James (February 11th, 2010). "IPCC Fourth Assessment Report is rubbish – says yet another expert". jamesdelingpole.com. Retrieved 13 April 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. Watts, Anthony (22 11 2009). "Bishop Hill's compendium of CRU email issues" (in English (US)). wattsupwiththat.com. Retrieved 13 April 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
Categories: