Misplaced Pages

Talk:Peekskill riots: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:22, 17 January 2006 editTJive (talk | contribs)4,555 edits Red scare← Previous edit Revision as of 07:41, 18 January 2006 edit undo211.30.206.11 (talk) Red scareNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
==Red scare== ==Red scare==
What he hell is the deal with this ] edit war? I've seen it removed and readded zillions of times without anyone giving a single justification for either edit. If you're going to edit war ''at least discuss it in the talk page''! I included it when I originally wrote this article, but I'm not married to having it remain if someone can give me any indication of why it should not stay. I'm going to re-add it if I don't hear anything soon. -] 19:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC) What he hell is the deal with this ] edit war? I've seen it removed and readded zillions of times without anyone giving a single justification for either edit. If you're going to edit war ''at least discuss it in the talk page''! I included it when I originally wrote this article, but I'm not married to having it remain if someone can give me any indication of why it should not stay. I'm going to re-add it if I don't hear anything soon. -] 19:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)



It would be good to make some reference to the heightened tensions of the immediate post-war era - I had used the word 'hysteria', which has been edited out. Unfortunately, I don't find the Red Scare article really fits the bill either (it reads, even to an English Socialist, as a bit POV). ] 00:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC) It would be good to make some reference to the heightened tensions of the immediate post-war era - I had used the word 'hysteria', which has been edited out. Unfortunately, I don't find the Red Scare article really fits the bill either (it reads, even to an English Socialist, as a bit POV). ] 00:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


:"Red Scare" is imprecise and inaccurate. In the context of post-WWII anti-communism, it is most closely associated with another pejorative, "McCarthyism" which is altogether irrelevant and immaterial to the event in question (and it's date). As for why there is an edit war, it is simply that this (mainly) anonymous user chooses to interfere (and usually revert) with any political article I choose to work on, no matter how slightly. It is not particularly a content dispute and I doubt he will be bothered to glance at the talk page. --] 06:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC) :"Red Scare" is imprecise and inaccurate. In the context of post-WWII anti-communism, it is most closely associated with another pejorative, "McCarthyism" which is altogether irrelevant and immaterial to the event in question (and it's date). As for why there is an edit war, it is simply that this (mainly) anonymous user chooses to interfere (and usually revert) with any political article I choose to work on, no matter how slightly. It is not particularly a content dispute and I doubt he will be bothered to glance at the talk page. --] 06:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

The term "Red Scare" is simply a compromise to TJive's pro-American bias, which he inserts daily at wikipedia.

Revision as of 07:41, 18 January 2006

This line seems ambiguous:

and, just months before the concert in 1949, he had appeared at the World Peace Conference in Paris, stating "it is unthinkable that American Negroes will go to war in behalf of those who have oppressed us for generations . . . against a country which in one generation has raised our people to the full dignity of mankind."

To which country is he referring? -- Viajero | Talk 17:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

The Soviet Union, apparently.
see: google and , ...
 — Davenbelle 08:35, May 22, 2005 (UTC)

Red scare

What he hell is the deal with this Red Scare edit war? I've seen it removed and readded zillions of times without anyone giving a single justification for either edit. If you're going to edit war at least discuss it in the talk page! I included it when I originally wrote this article, but I'm not married to having it remain if someone can give me any indication of why it should not stay. I'm going to re-add it if I don't hear anything soon. -R. fiend 19:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)


It would be good to make some reference to the heightened tensions of the immediate post-war era - I had used the word 'hysteria', which has been edited out. Unfortunately, I don't find the Red Scare article really fits the bill either (it reads, even to an English Socialist, as a bit POV). Linuxlad 00:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

"Red Scare" is imprecise and inaccurate. In the context of post-WWII anti-communism, it is most closely associated with another pejorative, "McCarthyism" which is altogether irrelevant and immaterial to the event in question (and it's date). As for why there is an edit war, it is simply that this (mainly) anonymous user chooses to interfere (and usually revert) with any political article I choose to work on, no matter how slightly. It is not particularly a content dispute and I doubt he will be bothered to glance at the talk page. --TJive 06:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

The term "Red Scare" is simply a compromise to TJive's pro-American bias, which he inserts daily at wikipedia.