| Revision as of 17:51, 18 January 2006 view sourceNygdan (talk | contribs)297 edits →CheckUser← Previous edit |
Revision as of 22:36, 18 January 2006 view source Freestylefrappe (talk | contribs)4,471 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
] until he votes in support of all candidates. Or dies. Whichever comes first. ''We'd prefer the latter''.]] |
|
] until he votes in support of all candidates. Or dies. Whichever comes first. ''We'd prefer the latter''.]] |
|
|
|
|
== CheckUser == |
|
|
... Why would I need an anonymous IP to do stuff? It's not appreciated that you're accusing me of being a sock, even though like I mentioned elsewhere that in itself isn't wrong to do. However, it's very incivil, and I'm shocked that you'd accuse an admin of doing such a thing. I'm sure a CheckUser will solve any further doubts you may have - I've never IP-edited. ]]</font> <sub>(]+])</sub> 04:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Nygdan== |
|
|
Hello Freestylefrappe, why did you remove my addition to the article on the ]? ] 1-18-2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
== Whoa, so the HO in IMHO doesn't matter? == |
|
|
|
|
|
"WMC is IMHO a jerk." That's an impossibly low bar you've set for NPA. And you didn't even warn me first. I don't think this was justified at all, really. ] 06:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for finally replying though. ] 06:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Poll, last section == |
|
|
|
|
|
That would be because I just added it ten minutes ago :) several people suggested that a new group be instated for de-adminning, hence my query what kind of group they'd mean. Would you mind placing it back, if you think it could be useful? Thx, ]]] 01:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC) |
|
