Revision as of 23:17, 18 January 2006 view sourceNygdan (talk | contribs)297 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:21, 19 January 2006 view source Mackensen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators125,063 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Excuse me, but you have said twice now that I have commited copyright violations in the ] entry, by in one case quoting and in another case discussing material in a publically available academic journal. Neither is a copyright violation. I have also tried communicating with you through this page, but you seem to have just deleted it and ignored it. ] 1-18-2006 | Excuse me, but you have said twice now that I have commited copyright violations in the ] entry, by in one case quoting and in another case discussing material in a publically available academic journal. Neither is a copyright violation. I have also tried communicating with you through this page, but you seem to have just deleted it and ignored it. ] 1-18-2006 | ||
I've no idea what you're referring to in your oppose vote and frankly I'm offended by the insinuation. I'd be happy to second the request for any such CheckUser request. ] ] 02:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:21, 19 January 2006
Excuse me, but you have said twice now that I have commited copyright violations in the bektashi entry, by in one case quoting and in another case discussing material in a publically available academic journal. Neither is a copyright violation. I have also tried communicating with you through this page, but you seem to have just deleted it and ignored it. Nygdan 1-18-2006
I've no idea what you're referring to in your oppose vote and frankly I'm offended by the insinuation. I'd be happy to second the request for any such CheckUser request. Mackensen (talk) 02:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)