| Revision as of 09:46, 19 January 2006 editRoke (talk | contribs)12,295 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:53, 19 January 2006 edit undoRoke (talk | contribs)12,295 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Vanity site <font color="blue"><b>]</b></font> <i><b>]</b></i> <font color="red"><b>]</b> </font> 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Vanity site <font color="blue"><b>]</b></font> <i><b>]</b></i> <font color="red"><b>]</b> </font> 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. I would say the MUSH itself might be popular enough to warrant an article, but this has uncorrectable POV problems as is. ] 03:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. I would say the MUSH itself might be popular enough to warrant an article, but this has uncorrectable POV problems as is. ] 03:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' advertising -- ]<small>|]</small> 09:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' advertising. p.s. to nom, ] is the same as valuable -- ]<small>|]</small> 09:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 19 January 2006
Havenmush
No media coverage. 100 nn Google hits. Copy/paste of their page. Submitted by site owner. Fails WP:V. Extremely invaluable information. -- Perfect Canada 00:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Haven't much of anything. --Perfecto Canada 00:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete blatant advertisement—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Onthost (talk • contribs) .
- Delete as above. Note: I'm about to remove a spamvert image, so if you need further convincing please do check the previous revision. --kingboyk 01:28, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity site J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I would say the MUSH itself might be popular enough to warrant an article, but this has uncorrectable POV problems as is. Meekohi 03:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete advertising. p.s. to nom, invaluable is the same as valuable -- Astrokey44|talk 09:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)