Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wtsao: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:55, 27 April 2010 editSamJohnston (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,963 edits +wecome  Revision as of 00:58, 27 April 2010 edit undoSamJohnston (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,963 edits COI Reminder: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{welcome}} {{welcome}}

== COI Reminder ==

] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things ] in the article ], you may have a ]. In keeping with Misplaced Pages's ] policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should '''avoid''' or '''exercise great caution''' when:
#'''editing''' or '''creating''' articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
#'''participating''' in ] about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
# '''linking''' to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see ]).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to ], ], and ].

For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have a conflict of interest, please see ]. Thank you.]{{Do not delete}}<!-- Template:uw-coi -->

Whether or not this is the result of a conflict, you have a bias and should also be careful with] and ]. Promoting the questionable criticism section to the top of the article was particularly problematic. -- <u style="text-decoration:none; font-family: papyrus;">] <small><sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub><sup><font color="green">]</font></sup></small></u> 00:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:58, 27 April 2010

Welcome!

Hi Wtsao! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

COI Reminder

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article cloud computing, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see Misplaced Pages:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Template:Do not delete

Whether or not this is the result of a conflict, you have a clearly stated bias and should also be careful withWP:V and WP:NPOV. Promoting the questionable criticism section to the top of the article was particularly problematic. -- samj in 00:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)