| Revision as of 10:01, 27 April 2010 editSamJohnston (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,963 edits →COI Reminder: expanded← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:14, 27 April 2010 edit undoSamJohnston (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,963 edits →3RR warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :Mass reverting changes made in good faith is vandalism. You calling me a vandal, that's hypocrisy. ] (]) 09:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | :Mass reverting changes made in good faith is vandalism. You calling me a vandal, that's hypocrisy. ] (]) 09:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR warning == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -- <u style="text-decoration:none; font-family: papyrus;">] <small><sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub><sup><font color="green">]</font></sup></small></u> 10:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:14, 27 April 2010
COI Reminder
Whether or not this is the result of a conflict, you have a clearly stated bias and should also be careful withWP:V and WP:NPOV. Promoting the questionable criticism section to the top of the article was particularly problematic. -- samj insup>out 00:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- The cloud computing article is not neutral. Being critical of that isn't COI. According to your blog, you work for a major stakeholder in "cloud computing". That's COI. You should avoid calling the kettle black and avoid interfering with neutral third parties. Wtsao (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- See WP:NOTCOI - citing WP:COI without associated policy violations can be considered a personal attack and calling yourself a "neutral third party" when you have a clearly stated bias is disingenuous at best. -- samj in 09:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism reminder
Hello, I'm SamJohnston. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to cloud computing have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- samj in 00:59, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
- Mass reverting changes made in good faith is vandalism. You calling me a vandal, that's hypocrisy. Wtsao (talk) 09:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Cloud computing. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- samj in 10:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)