Revision as of 19:00, 24 April 2010 editPurplebackpack89 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,718 editsm moved Talk:Warner Center, Los Angeles, California to Talk:Warner Center, Los Angeles: Per naming conventions of Chicago, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Cleveland, Detroit, &c (American cities who are notorious enough to not need the states in their nam...← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:21, 27 April 2010 edit undoLook2See1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users227,698 edits →Warner Center, Los Angeles, California: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
-Why is Warner City called an "Edge City"? Doesn't that connote that its an incorporated city? As far as I'm aware its a neighborhood in the SF Valley, not an independent city, but I could be wrong. -Alligator69 <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | -Why is Warner City called an "Edge City"? Doesn't that connote that its an incorporated city? As far as I'm aware its a neighborhood in the SF Valley, not an independent city, but I could be wrong. -Alligator69 <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 06:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
== Warner Center, Los Angeles, California == | |||
{{movereq|Warner Center, Los Angeles, California}} | |||
] → {{noredirect|1=Warner Center, Los Angeles, California}} | |||
Hi '''Purplebackpack89'''; Please consider: To align with predominant city's district/town nomenclature of 3 names; & for Spanish placename/word multiple use clarity. | |||
Also please consider one nomenclature system for all the neighborhoods, districts, and 'towns' within L.A. city limits would be easier with all editors knowing one template. As is now will have to search each one to enter link correctly in an article edit. If majority wants no Calif. it's certainly fine then, but a mixed system is hard for many. Would you consider stopping redoing until clarified please? Thanks---] (]) 22:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:21, 27 April 2010
California: Los Angeles Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
-Why is Warner City called an "Edge City"? Doesn't that connote that its an incorporated city? As far as I'm aware its a neighborhood in the SF Valley, not an independent city, but I could be wrong. -Alligator69 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.206.60 (talk) 06:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Warner Center, Los Angeles, California
It has been proposed in this section that Warner Center, Los Angeles be renamed and moved to Warner Center, Los Angeles, California. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move |
Warner Center, Los Angeles → Warner Center, Los Angeles, California
Hi Purplebackpack89; Please consider: To align with predominant city's district/town nomenclature of 3 names; & for Spanish placename/word multiple use clarity. Also please consider one nomenclature system for all the neighborhoods, districts, and 'towns' within L.A. city limits would be easier with all editors knowing one template. As is now will have to search each one to enter link correctly in an article edit. If majority wants no Calif. it's certainly fine then, but a mixed system is hard for many. Would you consider stopping redoing until clarified please? Thanks---Look2See1 (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories: