Misplaced Pages

Bishop Hill (blog): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:00, 28 April 2010 editKimDabelsteinPetersen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,610 edits Reverted to revision 358730411 by KimDabelsteinPetersen; rv Same coatracking as before + it still includes BLP material not in citations given.. using TW← Previous edit Revision as of 19:13, 28 April 2010 edit undoYilloslime (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,467 edits trying to clarify actual role of blogNext edit →
Line 46: Line 46:
}}</ref> }}</ref>


A post on the blog led to the resignation of ], the editor in chief of '']'' from the Independent Climate Change Email Review headed by Sir Muir Russell.{{Specify|date=April 2010}}<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> ], the editor in chief of '']'' resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after the blog (and ]) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup.{{Specify|date=April 2010}}<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref>


==External links== ==External links==

Revision as of 19:13, 28 April 2010

It has been suggested that this article be merged into The Hockey Stick Illusion. (Discuss) Proposed since April 2010.
An editor has nominated this article for deletion.
You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion.
Find sources: "Bishop Hill" blog – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FBishop+Hill+%28blog%29%5D%5DAFD
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template.

(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Bishop Hill
Type of siteBlog
Created byAndrew Montford
URLhttp://bishophill.squarespace.com/

Bishop Hill is a widely-read blog operated by Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion.

Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after the blog (and Channel 4) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup.

External links

References

  1. Webster, Ben (2010-03-23). "Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, 'has a conflict of interest'". timesonline.co.uk. The Times. Retrieved 2010-04-22. Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a "direct financial interest in the outcome" of his inquiry. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  2. Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
Categories: