Misplaced Pages

Bishop Hill (blog): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:47, 30 April 2010 editElectroshoxcure (talk | contribs)232 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:50, 30 April 2010 edit undoCla68 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers48,127 edits Only the Delingpole refs seem to be in dispute now that the AfD has closed as "no consensus". This article stays, I think because it was shown that it is notable.Next edit →
Line 41: Line 41:
}}</ref><ref>], "", '']'', 3 February 2010.</ref> }}</ref><ref>], "", '']'', 3 February 2010.</ref>


], the editor in chief of '']'', resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after Bishop Hill (and ]) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup.<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> ], the editor in chief of '']'' resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after Bishop Hill (and ]) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup.{{Specify|date=April 2010}}<ref name="The Guardian2">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/feb/12/climate-change-climategate-nature-global-warming|title=Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned|last=Batty|first=David|coauthors=David Adam|date=12 February 2010|publisher=www.guardian.co.uk|accessdate=7 April 2010}}</ref> ], writing for ], noted that the blog was one of several to initially report the story that ] had been choosen by the ] to head its enquiry into the ].<ref name="Andrew Orlowski">{{cite news|url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/26/uea_oxburgh_statement/|title=Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties|last=Orlowski |first=Andrew |date=26th March 2010|publisher=The Register|language=English|accessdate=12 April 2010}}</ref> The ] noted that the blog had criticised the ] of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's report on its investigation into the controversy.<ref>Harrabin, Roger, "", '']'', 31 March 2010.</ref> '']'' reported that Dr. Paul Dennis, a climate scientist, had posted an account on the blog of his interview with the police concerning their investigation into the unauthorized release of the emails from the ].<ref>'']'', "", 5 February 2010.</ref>


==External links== ==External links==

Revision as of 10:50, 30 April 2010

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)

No issues specified. Please specify issues, or remove this template.

(Learn how and when to remove this message)
Bishop Hill
Type of siteBlog
Created byAndrew Montford
URLhttp://bishophill.squarespace.com/

Bishop Hill is a blog operated by Andrew Montford, author of The Hockey Stick Illusion.

Philip Campbell, the editor in chief of Nature resigned from the Independent Climate Change Email Review after Bishop Hill (and Channel 4) publicized an interview he'd given in the Chinese media in which he stated that there was no evidence to suggest a coverup. Andrew Orlowski, writing for The Register, noted that the blog was one of several to initially report the story that Lord Oxburgh had been choosen by the University of East Anglia to head its enquiry into the Climatic Research Unit email controversy. The BBC noted that the blog had criticised the findings of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's report on its investigation into the controversy. The Daily Mail reported that Dr. Paul Dennis, a climate scientist, had posted an account on the blog of his interview with the police concerning their investigation into the unauthorized release of the emails from the Climatic Research Unit.

External links

References

  1. Webster, Ben (2010-03-23). "Lord Oxburgh, the climate science peer, 'has a conflict of interest'". timesonline.co.uk. The Times. Retrieved 2010-04-22. Andrew Montford, a climate-change sceptic who writes the widely-read Bishop Hill blog, said that Lord Oxburgh had a "direct financial interest in the outcome" of his inquiry. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  2. Matt Ridley, "The global warming guerrillas", The Spectator, 3 February 2010.
  3. Batty, David (12 February 2010). "Climate emails review panellist quits after his impartiality questioned". www.guardian.co.uk. Retrieved 7 April 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. Orlowski, Andrew (26th March 2010). "Anglia defends Oxburgh's eco network ties". The Register. Retrieved 12 April 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. Harrabin, Roger, "Climate science must be more open, say MPs", BBC News, 31 March 2010.
  6. The Daily Mail, "Police question global warming 'sceptic' scientist over 'Climategate' email leak", 5 February 2010.
Categories: