Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Graham Diamond: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:30, 16 January 2006 editMonicasdude (talk | contribs)3,505 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 04:07, 21 January 2006 edit undoArbustoo (talk | contribs)12,546 editsm []Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
* '''comment''' have cleaned it up somewhat. No idea if he's worth keeping, American authors aint my thing.... Abstain. ] 10:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC) * '''comment''' have cleaned it up somewhat. No idea if he's worth keeping, American authors aint my thing.... Abstain. ] 10:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep'''. Prolific author of potboiler fantasy/sf, published by US mass market houses in the 1980s. ] 15:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Strong Keep'''. Prolific author of potboiler fantasy/sf, published by US mass market houses in the 1980s. ] 15:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep''' ] 04:07, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:07, 21 January 2006

Graham Diamond

Poorly written article about an author, which is likely vanity. Sales ranks for his books at Amazon seem to be well over 1,000,000. Around 900 googles for "Graham Diamond", but many appear to be "Graham-Diamond" (two separate people), no relation. In any case, thats very few for someone who has evidently authored so many books. Not sure if any are vanity presses or not. -R. fiend 04:12, 16 January 2006 (UTC)