Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Robert Morey: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:06, 21 January 2006 editYellowMonkey (talk | contribs)86,443 edits []: delete← Previous edit Revision as of 06:50, 21 January 2006 edit undoArbustoo (talk | contribs)12,546 editsm []Next edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
*'''Delete''' as per JzG. This attempt to include all sorts of people of highly questionable credentials and notability does not reflect well on Misplaced Pages. ] 02:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as per JzG. This attempt to include all sorts of people of highly questionable credentials and notability does not reflect well on Misplaced Pages. ] 02:19, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as a non-notable charlatan, with self-awarded-and-styled diploma mill degrees, of no academic worthiness and none relevant to poltics/theology overlap. ] 04:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as a non-notable charlatan, with self-awarded-and-styled diploma mill degrees, of no academic worthiness and none relevant to poltics/theology overlap. ] 04:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Should part of this biography be blended into an article about ]? ] 06:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:50, 21 January 2006

Robert Morey

Submitted by an anon via Articles for Creation. Serious problems with NPOV, several dubious claims and rebuttals, but no actual indication of why the hell we should care who this guy is. The section arguing about the legitimacy of his claimed doctorates is far and away the most interesting part ofg the article,and that only to see just how POV it can get before someone steps in and speedies it as an attack. Just zis  Guy, you know? / AfD? 01:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Right . . . because you're the Christian who wants to get rid of Christian entries on Misplaced Pages; even obvious keepers like Thomas Ice and Grant Jeffrey. Makes sense to people from outer space. --Jason Gastrich 10:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
He wants to keep relevant and notable Christian entries. The debate is the relevance and notability of the subject, not whether or not the A.J.A. is attacking "christian articles". -Harvestdancer 17:40, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Ironically, if I were more concerned with promoting Christianity I would've voted to delete the Gothard article. A.J.A. 20:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)