Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:53, 10 May 2010 editStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Suspected sockpuppets: Another← Previous edit Revision as of 05:54, 10 May 2010 edit undoStephan Schulz (talk | contribs)Administrators26,888 edits →Evidence submitted by ChrisO: AnotherNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


On the other hand, ] is clearly Scibaby. -- ] (]) 01:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC) On the other hand, ] is clearly Scibaby. -- ] (]) 01:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by ] </span>======
<!--## Sign below your evidence with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" ##-->
Another one. --] (]) 05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>======

Revision as of 05:54, 10 May 2010

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.

Report date April 25 2010, 15:12 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Prolog

The usual. Prolog (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by ChrisO

I just added User:Stympkin. The editing pattern of this one is odd. It looks Scibaby-like in parts but has some anomalous elements which don't fit the usual Scibaby pattern; however, clearly not a new editor, so perhaps a sockpuppet of someone else? Or maybe Scibaby is changing his pattern? -- ChrisO (talk) 23:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

On the other hand, User:ISandert is clearly Scibaby. -- ChrisO (talk) 01:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

Another one. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 05:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

All First four blocked and tagged, but a sleeper check would still be appreciated. Thanks, - 2/0 (cont.) 16:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Blocked ISandert as well. Stympkin looks likely, but I am not sure enough to WP:DUCK it right now. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Blocked Stympkin and a new one; Virnbaum. Prolog (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Blocked Sma888. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Added and blocked Hughiefd; this one might be User:ChildofMidnight (or possibly User:Grundle2600) instead of Scibaby, but they are definitely a sock. - 2/0 (cont.) 07:58, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Prolog (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed The usual, confirmation, sleeper check, etc. Elockid 15:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Categories: