Misplaced Pages

Arles bust: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:55, 11 March 2010 editCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers171,987 editsm vs← Previous edit Revision as of 21:34, 17 May 2010 edit undoFlamarande (talk | contribs)8,849 edits I honestly despise this political correct/simple anti-Christian product. However the article began with BCE.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
] ]
The '''Arles portrait bust''' was discovered in the ] near ], southern France, by divers from the French Department of Subaquatic Archaeological Research,<ref>The ''Département des recherches archéologiques subaquatiques et sous-marines (Drassm).</ref> in September-October 2007. It comprises a life-sized marble bust showing an aging man with wrinkles, deep naso-labial creases and hollows in his face.<ref>During the same campaign, divers also recovered smaller statues of ] in Hellenistic style and a life-size marble sculpture of ] dating, from its style, to the third century CE. </ref> The uncompromising realism of the portrait places it in the tradition of late Republican portrait and genre sculptures. The immediate reaction was that this was a portrait of ] and that it should be given a date range of about 46 BC/BCE. The '''Arles portrait bust''' was discovered in the ] near ], southern France, by divers from the French Department of Subaquatic Archaeological Research,<ref>The ''Département des recherches archéologiques subaquatiques et sous-marines (Drassm).</ref> in September-October 2007. It comprises a life-sized marble bust showing an aging man with wrinkles, deep naso-labial creases and hollows in his face.<ref>During the same campaign, divers also recovered smaller statues of ] in Hellenistic style and a life-size marble sculpture of ] dating, from its style, to the third century CE. </ref> The uncompromising realism of the portrait places it in the tradition of late Republican portrait and genre sculptures. The immediate reaction was that this was a portrait of ] and that it should be given a date range of about 46 BCE.


After Caesar's assassination in 44 BCE, portraits of him would have been discreetly disposed of, as politically dangerous possessions.<ref>"I suspect the bust was thrown in the river after he was assassinated because it would not have been good at that time to be considered a follower of his," said French archaeologist Luc Long, quoted by Agence France Presse at the time the discovery was revealed (; ).</ref> After Caesar's assassination in 44 BCE, portraits of him would have been discreetly disposed of, as politically dangerous possessions.<ref>"I suspect the bust was thrown in the river after he was assassinated because it would not have been good at that time to be considered a follower of his," said French archaeologist Luc Long, quoted by Agence France Presse at the time the discovery was revealed (; ).</ref>

Revision as of 21:34, 17 May 2010

File:Arles portrait bust.jpg
Photograph of the bust

The Arles portrait bust was discovered in the Rhone River near Arles, southern France, by divers from the French Department of Subaquatic Archaeological Research, in September-October 2007. It comprises a life-sized marble bust showing an aging man with wrinkles, deep naso-labial creases and hollows in his face. The uncompromising realism of the portrait places it in the tradition of late Republican portrait and genre sculptures. The immediate reaction was that this was a portrait of Julius Caesar and that it should be given a date range of about 46 BCE.

After Caesar's assassination in 44 BCE, portraits of him would have been discreetly disposed of, as politically dangerous possessions.

France's Minister of Culture Christine Albanel reported on May 13, 2008 that the bust would be the oldest known representation of Caesar.

Reactions

The story was picked up by many major media outlets.

The identification as Caesar was immediately disputed, apparently on the basis of photographs, by Mary Beard in the Times Literary Supplement.

Other historians and archaeologists not affiliated with the French administration, among them the archaeologist and expert on Caesar and Augustus Paul Zanker, were also quick to deny that the portrait bust is of Caesar. Many noted the lack of resemblances to Caesar's likenesses issued on coins during the last years of the dictator's life, and to the "Tusculum bust" of Caesar, which depicts Julius Caesar in his lifetime, either as a so-called zeitgesicht or as a direct portrait. After a further stylistic assessment Zanker dated the Arles bust to the Augustan period. Elkins pointed out the third century CE as the outside terminus post quem for the deposition of the statues, thereby refuting the claim that the bust was thrown away due to feared repercussions from Caesar's assassination in 44 BCE.

The argument by the French archaeologists that Caesar had founded the colony in 46 BCE shows to be incorrect, as the colony was founded by Caesar's former quaestor Tiberius Claudius Nero on the dictator's orders in his absence.

Mary Beard has accused the persons involved in the find of inventing their claims for publicity reasons. The French ministry of culture has not yet responded to the criticism and negative reviews.

Notes

  1. The Département des recherches archéologiques subaquatiques et sous-marines (Drassm).
  2. During the same campaign, divers also recovered smaller statues of Marsyas in Hellenistic style and a life-size marble sculpture of Neptune dating, from its style, to the third century CE.
  3. "I suspect the bust was thrown in the river after he was assassinated because it would not have been good at that time to be considered a follower of his," said French archaeologist Luc Long, quoted by Agence France Presse at the time the discovery was revealed (Bust from riverbed reveals face of Julius Caesar: archeologist; France24: "Un buste de Jules César découvert à Arles", 14 May 2008).
  4. Original communique (May 13, 2008); second communique (May 20, 2008); report (May 20, 2008)
  5. E.g. "Divers find marble bust of Caesar that may date to 46 B.C.", CNN-Online et al.; Video (QuickTime) on the archaeological find (France 3)
  6. Mary Beard, "The face of Julius Caesar? Come off it!", TLS 14 May 2008, on-line
  7. Paul Zanker, "Der Echte war energischer, distanzierter, ironischer", Sueddeutsche Zeitung, May 25, 2008, on-line; Nathan T. Elkins, 'Oldest Bust' of Julius Caesar found in France?, May 14, 2008, on-line
  8. the "Tusculan bust": image at the AERIA library.
  9. A different approach was presented by Mary Beard in that members of a military Caesarian colony would not have discarded portraits of Caesar, whom they worshipped as god, although statues were in fact destroyed by the Anti-Caesarians in the city of Rome after Caesar's assassination (Appian, BC III.1.9).
  10. Konrat Ziegler and Walther Sontheimer (eds.), "Arelate", in Der Kleine Pauly: Lexikon der Antike, Vol. 1, col. 525, Munich 1979; in 46 BCE Caesar himself was campaigning in Africa, before returning to Rome.
Categories: