Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nableezy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:16, 26 May 2010 view sourceNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,183 edits Deir Yassin, Bard and stuff← Previous edit Revision as of 21:32, 26 May 2010 view source HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,847 edits Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone: new sectionNext edit →
Line 81: Line 81:
::Judging from ur comment on the discussion page, I see u have zero interest in compromising. I thought more of you Nab.--] (]) 19:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC) ::Judging from ur comment on the discussion page, I see u have zero interest in compromising. I thought more of you Nab.--] (]) 19:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
:::Im sorry to disappoint, but I dont see how compiling a list of high quality sources is a problem. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 19:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)</font></small> :::Im sorry to disappoint, but I dont see how compiling a list of high quality sources is a problem. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 19:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)</font></small>

== Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on ] ==

<center>'''You are receiving this message because of your involvement at the ] article. Please don't consider it an assumption of bad faith'''</center>
As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below.

*Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
*The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
*Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
*Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ].
*In relation to the above, you are informed that the ] article is under a blanket 1RR restriction and violations of this restriction will result in escalating blocks and/or topic/page bans. Thank you for your cooperation. ] &#124; ] 21:32, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:32, 26 May 2010

I was smoking the other night and I began to violently cough. I coughed so hard that I pulled a muscle in my back. So what did I do next? Smoked some more to try to ease the pain.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Going home

Enjoy your time in Egypt, you gangster. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 20:12, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Malik (and be happy I didnt link to to this version, misspellings and all). nableezy - 23:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

So here's my thoughts

Now I know you're stagging in Egypt so I don't expect you to get back to me right away but here's what I was thinking. If the Canucks win, you have to put an image of their jersey on your userpage. And if the Hawks win you can put one on my userpage. I'd do it myself but I'm no good at that kind of thing. --JGGardiner (talk) 03:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. You really should consider rooting for a major league team. nableezy - 23:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
That wasn't exactly what I had in mind. But thanks for the pictures. The Hawks have definitely drafted some top-notch players over the years. At least they didn't tank all those seasons for nothing. --JGGardiner (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, but we cant just put a pic of the jersey (no non-free images in userspace). From what I understand, it is extremely easy in Canuckistan to acquire a certain medication to help with the bitterness you are feeling. nableezy - 18:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Uh, apropos innuendoes, I think you missed one JGG, regarding N's suggestion you 'root for a major league team', though I fail to see how it would help. See root. Def.14. By the way, by my calculations you are posting at an ungodly hour and should be kipping. Nishidani (talk) 09:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Well Nab should know that I can enjoy a good game without rooting for anyone in particular. Besides, the national sport of Canada isn't hockey, it's lacrosse. --JGGardiner (talk) 21:52, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
That would be a terrible train to take. nableezy - 18:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm currently monitoring this page using my SPOT 5 satellite feed to prevent terrorist incursions. It took me literally hours to data mine your recent contributions but I have to say that this is one of the finest examples that I've seen recently of the supreme fidelity of human communication relative to all other known life forms. We rock ! Sean.hoyland - talk 04:26, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

thoughts

vs Sean.hoyland - talk 05:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Same style, wouldnt surprise me. nableezy - 13:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Articles common between this new user and past NoCal100 socks
Wow, that's shocking behavior, someone creating the 'Wake Up Call (Maroon 5 song)' article. SPI time methinks. I'll file one a bit later. Thanks for the data. Sean.hoyland - talk 01:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Ah, didn't notice those bits. Thanks. Sean.hoyland - talk 04:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Also, any thoughts on whether (the most wonderful blog in the world) is an RS. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Chill son, that site is useful, best to keep it private. nableezy - 18:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Good lord, I just found out that I was a "Palestinian-Arab in Europe", part of the ‘Radical Arab-Islamic Lobby’! Lol! Not bad, for an old Lutheran gal, whose ancestors are 100% Scandinavian, (genealogy being one of my hobbies)  ;) Cheers, Huldra (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Or so you say, Hussam... Zero 16:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Well, I certainly enjoyed reading it. The concept itself is great. The implementation is slightly ruined by the blogger apparently suffering from some kind of mental illness. Sean.hoyland - talk 02:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Bard and Deir Yassin

Hey Nab how r u? As for Bard, I don't see how you can attack him while leaving the likes of Ilan Pappe (who represents the extreme left of Israel and advocates its demise), Daniel McGowan of Counterpunch and Rashid Khalidi (who never met an Israel hater he didn't like), unscathed. It's a little hypocritical. Respectfully--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 04:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I dont think I advocated using Counterpunch as a source, but as to Pappe and Khalidi. Those are two university professors who have written works published by academic presses, Khalidi is editor of the Journal of Palestine Studies which is published by the University of California Press. He has also been published by Columbia University Press and Cambridge University Press. There are things by Pappe that I would not use as a RS, but the things that he has had published by such publishers as Cambridge University Press is fine. You give me something from Bard that is published by a respected academic publisher fine, but Myths and Facts aint that. nableezy - 06:16, 23 May 2010 (UTC)


I did not know that you had started a report before I saw it after I had pressed "save". I will make a habit of stalking you in the future!, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Leave us alone

It's bad enough that you Chicagoans come up here and beat us at our national sport. But you could at least leave us our national pasttimes like poutine eating. I don't want to hear about some Illinoisian pot-smoking champion coming up here. --JGGardiner (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I hope Montreal pulls it off, nothing would satisfy me more than beating another Canadian team, actually, scratch that, the Canadian team. nableezy - 22:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to barge in, but are you guys talking about a sport? Something people actually watch? Cause I'm drawing a blank. Oh, and Nab, was wondering: how do you do that nifty page notice that pops up when one edits your talk page? I want one. IronDuke 22:10, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Sort of, something close to football (soccer, or in my country just "ball") on ice. JGG wouldnt say "a" sport, it is "the" sport to his fellow Cannukistanis. For the edit notice, edit this page, whatever you put there, including a template or anything else you want, will show up when somebody edits the page. nableezy - 22:15, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Oh, ok, thanks. I thought their national support was curling or hurling or something. I need to get out more. IronDuke 22:27, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Deir Yassin, Bard and stuff

Hello Nab. Though we're on opposite sides of the divide and represent opposing views, we have, in the past set aside our differences and worked together toward compromise. I have left a conciliatory message on the discussion page and request that you take a look and offer some suggestions. Respectfully,--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 15:54, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

sure. nableezy - 15:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Judging from ur comment on the discussion page, I see u have zero interest in compromising. I thought more of you Nab.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 19:12, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Im sorry to disappoint, but I dont see how compiling a list of high quality sources is a problem. nableezy - 19:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Notification: General sanctions and 1RR restriction on Richard Goldstone

You are receiving this message because of your involvement at the Richard Goldstone article. Please don't consider it an assumption of bad faith

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

  • Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
  • The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
  • Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
  • Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.