| Revision as of 12:46, 2 June 2010 editRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 edits comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:38, 2 June 2010 edit undoRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 editsm →Sika redemNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Comment'''. I have to admire the nominator's attitude here. Being ] means writing articles, not trying to make them go away. Therefore, deleting articles should not be something that one wants to do. If more nominators had this attitude then AFD would be a more pleasant place to work and we would have |
*'''Comment'''. I have to admire the nominator's attitude here. Being ] means writing articles, not trying to make them go away. Therefore, deleting articles should not be something that one wants to do. If more nominators had this attitude then AFD would be a more pleasant place to work and we would have fewer ] AFDs. Article tagged for rescue--] (]) 12:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 2 June 2010
Sika redem
AfDs for this article:- Sika redem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading WP:MUSIC makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although Undergroove Records may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. Narutolovehinata5 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. I have to admire the nominator's attitude here. Being here to build an encyclopedia means writing articles, not trying to make them go away. Therefore, deleting articles should not be something that one wants to do. If more nominators had this attitude then AFD would be a more pleasant place to work and we would have fewer battleground AFDs. Article tagged for rescue--Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)