Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sika redem (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:38, 2 June 2010 editRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 editsm Sika redem← Previous edit Revision as of 17:16, 2 June 2010 edit undoChris Neville-Smith (talk | contribs)2,847 edits Sika redem: Borderline keepNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- ] (]) 12:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
*'''Comment'''. I have to admire the nominator's attitude here. Being ] means writing articles, not trying to make them go away. Therefore, deleting articles should not be something that one wants to do. If more nominators had this attitude then AFD would be a more pleasant place to work and we would have fewer ] AFDs. Article tagged for rescue--] (]) 12:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC) *'''Comment'''. I have to admire the nominator's attitude here. Being ] means writing articles, not trying to make them go away. Therefore, deleting articles should not be something that one wants to do. If more nominators had this attitude then AFD would be a more pleasant place to work and we would have fewer ] AFDs. Article tagged for rescue--] (]) 12:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
*'''Borderline keep''', with a major ] rewrite needed. Criterion #5 of ] is "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." They've got one album and one EP to an indie record label (]) that sort of qualifies. That alone I'd say wasn't quite enough, but adding the reviews from Kerrang and Rocksound, the profile in NME and the airplay on Radio 1, I think it scrapes it by the narrowest of margins. ] (]) 17:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:16, 2 June 2010

Sika redem

AfDs for this article:
Sika redem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renominating as the last AfD reached no consensus (no votes). I am somewhat reluctant to renominate this as reading WP:MUSIC makes me think it passes No. 1 of the criteria for musicians and ensembles as well as No. 5 (although Undergroove Records may not meet the requirement of major independent label and that the second album is only speculated). Despite this, almost all I could find were databases, I did find a BBC Local, Rock Sound and DiScover stuff on Google, but nothing about participating in a tour. While I believe they are promising, I don't think that they are notable enough for Misplaced Pages just yet. Should more sources be found, I will withdraw this AfD, but the article should have re-write, have more sources and should be expanded. Narutolovehinata5 06:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Categories: