Revision as of 23:12, 15 November 2009 editSturmvogel 66 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers131,520 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:05, 2 June 2010 edit undoTothwolf (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,326 editsm {{High traffic}}Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | {{Talkheader}} | ||
{{WPAVIATION|class=C|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|aircraft=yes}} | {{WPAVIATION|class=C|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|aircraft=yes}} | ||
{{High traffic|date=30 May 2010|url=http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/05/30/1428206/SOFIA-Sees-Jupiters-Ancient-Heat|site=Slashdot}} | |||
== What's up with the image widths? == | == What's up with the image widths? == |
Revision as of 23:05, 2 June 2010
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Aviation: Aircraft C‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
On 30 May 2010, Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
What's up with the image widths?
Check the two images of the SOFIA aircraft on the top right. Both are thumbs set at 280px, yet the image on the top is less wider than the one below it. I want both to be of the same width. Can any of you see what is wrong?--PremKudva 06:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Unconfirmed statement
I removed the following statement from the article because I don't see any means to bring it into compliance with Misplaced Pages:Citing sources.
- The first school children to see it were students from Waco Montessori School.
I could not find any source that would corroborate this assertion. It may well be true, but without a reference we can't be sure.—RJH (talk) 19:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- You were right, there is no way to verify it, and additionally that information is not important to the article. I mean what next, a visit from retirees from a nearby home?--PremKudva 03:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)