Revision as of 03:58, 2 June 2010 editZuluPapa5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,447 edits →Comments by other users: suspicious← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:47, 2 June 2010 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz: adding oneNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --] (]) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ::Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --] (]) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::Bayesian algorithm says "Reply hazy, try again." ] (]) 20:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | :::Bayesian algorithm says "Reply hazy, try again." ] (]) 20:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
Added Weakopedia. Probably not Scibaby, but definitely someone per first edit, general stalkery behavior of various persons and username/userpage being obvious not-new-user territory. Note that Ombudsperson Lar has stated in - " If I were a current CU (as an Ombudsman I am recused from any CU activity) I'd probably run a check, it's within the CU remit to do that when we think things are "off"," so no need to be concerned about the Ombudspersons coming down on you. ] (]) 23:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
Revision as of 23:47, 2 June 2010
Scibaby
Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/1
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/2
- Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive/3
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.
01 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- ClimateOracle (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- WavePart (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz
The usual. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Added WavePart. Hipocrite (talk) 10:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Bayesian algorithm says "Reply hazy, try again." Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Added Weakopedia. Probably not Scibaby, but definitely someone per first edit, general stalkery behavior of various persons and username/userpage being obvious not-new-user territory. Note that Ombudsperson Lar has stated in - " If I were a current CU (as an Ombudsman I am recused from any CU activity) I'd probably run a check, it's within the CU remit to do that when we think things are "off"," so no need to be concerned about the Ombudspersons coming down on you. Hipocrite (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
No reasoning but suspicious is given. I am suspicious that these blocks are helping Misplaced Pages to guide new editors to productive contributions. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Categories: