Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:16, 3 June 2010 editZuluPapa5 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,447 edits →Comments by other users: mooted by split← Previous edit Revision as of 03:21, 3 June 2010 edit undoInkSplotch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users821 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit →
Line 53: Line 53:
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>======
Hipocrite, i appreciate you are concerned about weakopedia, however you may be abusing this page, please reconsider. <s>I have not seen a second to your concern</s>, <s>you added after the endorsement</s> and you were just involved with weakopedia about this scibaby topic which looks like a retributive request. ] (]) 01:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Hipocrite, i appreciate you are concerned about weakopedia, however you may be abusing this page, please reconsider. <s>I have not seen a second to your concern</s>, <s>you added after the endorsement</s> and you were just involved with weakopedia about this scibaby topic which looks like a retributive request. ] (]) 01:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:It's also worthwhile to note that weakopedia had actually requested Hipocrite bring his concerns to (this) the appropriate venu, both on the Climate Change RfE page, and Lar's talk page. Rather than retributive, I believe it's a good faith attempt to settle a concern the proper way. --] (]) 03:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>======

Revision as of 03:21, 3 June 2010

Scibaby

Scibaby (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Scibaby.


01 June 2010


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz

The usual. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Added WavePart. Hipocrite (talk) 10:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Bayesian algorithm says "Reply hazy, try again." Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

No reasoning but suspicious is given. I am suspicious that these blocks are helping Misplaced Pages to guide new editors to productive contributions. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)


03 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Hipocrite

Added Weakopedia. Probably not Scibaby, but definitely someone per first edit, general stalkery behavior of various persons and username/userpage being obvious not-new-user territory. Note that Ombudsperson Lar has stated in - " If I were a current CU (as an Ombudsman I am recused from any CU activity) I'd probably run a check, it's within the CU remit to do that when we think things are "off"," so no need to be concerned about the Ombudspersons coming down on you. Hipocrite (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

Hipocrite, i appreciate you are concerned about weakopedia, however you may be abusing this page, please reconsider. I have not seen a second to your concern, you added after the endorsement and you were just involved with weakopedia about this scibaby topic which looks like a retributive request. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 01:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

It's also worthwhile to note that weakopedia had actually requested Hipocrite bring his concerns to (this) the appropriate venu, both on the Climate Change RfE page, and Lar's talk page. Rather than retributive, I believe it's a good faith attempt to settle a concern the proper way. --InkSplotch (talk) 03:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.
Categories: