| Revision as of 14:41, 3 June 2010 editDeor (talk | contribs)Administrators157,924 edits Creating deletion discussion for Wendy Swanscombe | Revision as of 04:12, 4 June 2010 edit undoInniverse (talk | contribs)1,802 edits keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' - Well known and prolific author has 66 hits on Gbooks . ] (]) 04:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:12, 4 June 2010
Wendy Swanscombe
- Wendy Swanscombe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another target of our newest(?) serial deprodder; prod rationale was "Non-notable person, unreferenced, not even clear that this is a real person". In any event, I can find no substantive treatment of this perhaps-living person in reliable, independent sources, nor evidence that any of the criteria of WP:AUTHOR are satisfied. Deor (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 14:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Well known and prolific author has 66 hits on Gbooks . Inniverse (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)