| Revision as of 17:30, 9 June 2010 editLocation (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users23,986 edits →Vanessa Rogers: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:15, 9 June 2010 edit undoScottywong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,031 edits →Vanessa RogersNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{Find sources|Vanessa Rogers}}) | :({{Find sources|Vanessa Rogers}}) | ||
| Contested prod. I can find no substantive treatment of this person in ] that would satisfy the requirements of ] or the criteria of ]. ] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | Contested prod. I can find no substantive treatment of this person in ] that would satisfy the requirements of ] or the criteria of ]. ] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| {{ARSnote}} | |||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small><small>—] (]) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)</small> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
| :She has some coveage as you've mentioned, I'm not convinced it is enough to demonstrate notability though, it's pretty minor stuff and a weak keep at best, I'll stay with delete. ] (]) 07:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | :She has some coveage as you've mentioned, I'm not convinced it is enough to demonstrate notability though, it's pretty minor stuff and a weak keep at best, I'll stay with delete. ] (]) 07:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources does not exist for this particular "Vanessa Rogers". Although it is possible to scour the internet for tidbits of information on various individuals, that does not make it "significant coverage". Claim to fame is as an author and she does not meet the guidelines at ]. ] (]) 17:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources does not exist for this particular "Vanessa Rogers". Although it is possible to scour the internet for tidbits of information on various individuals, that does not make it "significant coverage". Claim to fame is as an author and she does not meet the guidelines at ]. ] (]) 17:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' this ]. Fails ]. ] <small>]</small> 23:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:15, 9 June 2010
Vanessa Rogers
- Vanessa Rogers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. I can find no substantive treatment of this person in reliable, independent sources that would satisfy the requirements of WP:BIO or the criteria of WP:AUTHOR. Deor (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Deor (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. I googled her, the first link is her home page. The article appears to be true and demonstrates she is non notable. Szzuk (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
- Weak Keep She's does have some press coverage describing her as "a highly respected trainer" . As far as significant coverage, I'm not so sure. Cyberbullying is a very hot topic with the deaths of Megan Meier and Phoebe Prince. Rogers may be of interest to some readers. I have added some sourcing. Eudemis (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
*Keep Notable in Britain for her leading work in the area of Cyberbullying, and as a speaker and trainer known for her work with young men. Inniverse (talk) 03:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Inniverse blocked as sock of Azviz.—Kww(talk) 16:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Irony. Szzuk (talk) 22:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Google news only finds one thing listing her and cyberbullying . She writes for Young People Now which although only has 18,000 readers seems notable the BBC did commission here to work on two series, one of which has a Misplaced Pages article, The Baby Borrowers. Is the award she got notable? "highly and unequivocally recommended" review from Library Journal Dream Focus 04:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- She has some coveage as you've mentioned, I'm not convinced it is enough to demonstrate notability though, it's pretty minor stuff and a weak keep at best, I'll stay with delete. Szzuk (talk) 07:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources does not exist for this particular "Vanessa Rogers". Although it is possible to scour the internet for tidbits of information on various individuals, that does not make it "significant coverage". Claim to fame is as an author and she does not meet the guidelines at WP:AUTHOR. Location (talk) 17:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete this resume. Fails WP:AUTHOR. SnottyWong talk 23:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)