Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:08, 10 June 2010

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Bluewave, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Bluewave/MOMK. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Z.'s tempering with editors posts/comments

You might want to watch out for Z.'s tempering with your posts/comments like this one here that I reversed. The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 23:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the warning. Yet another abuse of Misplaced Pages that I'll have to spend time looking out for :-( Bluewave (talk) 08:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

MoMK rewrite sub

If I implement(ed) American-English please rv./change. Thanks.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I reckon you are pretty good at switching between variants of English...and American English is the least of our problems with the article, but thanks for asking, and I'll look out for any areas where the Queen might be offended by abuses of "her" English :-) Cheers. Bluewave (talk) 21:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes, It's the least of our problem(s) and yet the easiest one to prevent. So why not fix it right away (as needed) before your Queen might be offended? :) The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 21:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

• Keep up the good work over there and I'll try to go over it as I did today and before and at some point will also check the souces to make sure they really fit (although I trust you and am not "concerned" as I am with other editors, who at least in part, applied their own OR interpretation or, (occasionally) the citation even didn't fit at all.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 21:48, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote of confidence! Actually, I haven't checked all the cites very carefully. One problem is that I've copied some named references across from the original text and it makes it a bit difficult to check. The other problem is that a lot of the cites are to the Michaeli judgement and my grasp of Italian is not really good enough. I was hoping to go over all the references later and try to find the best sources. Another problem I'm conscious of is that I believe The Times is planning to make its archive available on a subscription-only basis at some point and this may screw us up in the future. Bluewave (talk) 08:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry for not responding to your posts on the talkpage and not working on the draft itself for several days. I really would like to but just can't for very personal reasons. I feel a bit bad about it since you're doing the major (or better said all the work) over there. But you're doing a good job so far and once the citations are mostly implemented, I'm with Averell23 and think we can move it to mainspace to work out the (never-ending) rest.The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 23:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

OK thanks. I'm just slightly concerned that I may be putting a lot of work into something that isn't what people wants and ends up going nowhere. Bluewave (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

"(Britons never, never, never shall be screwed)"

Umh, so how do you manage Reproduction? XD The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Of couse, I'm just "screwing" with you ;). Cheers, The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

It's a mystery! Bluewave (talk) 09:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh yes, it's a mystery, or is it?The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 23:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

New article for Amanda Knox

I haven't seen you post anything about the new article "Amanda Knox" so this is just a friendly notice that the article has been approved for expansion. Many other people have already edited the article, so I thought perhaps you did not know about it. This is just a friendly notice, that the article is open, but please feel free to ignore this message, and I am not suggesting that you need to edit the article. You know, restrictions in notifying other users. -Wikid77 (talk) 01:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)