| Revision as of 19:11, 27 January 2006 editCloud02 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users771 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:29, 27 January 2006 edit undoSnailwalker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,098 edits added infoNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''Muhammed Drawings''' became late in ], the centre of a major political controversy in Denmark following the publishing of 12 ] ]s of the ]ic prophet ] on ], 2005, including one suggesting he had a bomb in his turban. The drawings were printed by '']'' as a satirical illustration to go along an article on ] and ], commenting on the fact that no artist was willing to illustrate a childrens book by the Danish writer ] about Muhammad without remaining anonymous, allegedly for fear of revenge from extremist Muslims, as depicting Muhammad is prohibited according to Islamic belief. While the newspaper maintains that the drawings were an exercise in free speech, many Muslims in ] and further afield viewed them as a provocation. Two newspaper cartoonists were reportedly driven into hiding after death threats were issued against them and the paper has revised and heightened its security procedures. | |||
| ==International consequences== | |||
| The embassy of ] in ] told the Danish prime minister, ], to penalize the drawers, and the controversy produced ] in ] and ]. The case is now being brought to the ]. | The embassy of ] in ] told the Danish prime minister, ], to penalize the drawers, and the controversy produced ] in ] and ]. The case is now being brought to the ]. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
| The boycott has spread to ]. | The boycott has spread to ]. | ||
| A ] ], ''Magazinet'', printed the drawings after getting authorization from ] and it led to a great debate in ] as well. A Norwegian man made a threat against the lives of the people at the magazine, but later admitted, when faced by the police, that it was just a prank. Some Swedish newspapers has considered printing the drawings as well. | |||
| ⚫ | The general opinion in Denmark is that the drawings do not violate the law of free speech, and neither the newspaper nor the cartoonists have apologized for publishing them. | ||
| ==Opinions in Denmark== | |||
| ⚫ | The general opinion in Denmark is that the drawings do not violate the law of free speech, and neither the newspaper nor the cartoonists have apologized for publishing them. The question whether the drawings should be printed has been discussed a lot in Denmark from letters to the Editors, to ] and to ]s and universities at open debate meetings. | ||
Revision as of 19:29, 27 January 2006
The Muhammed Drawings became late in 2005, the centre of a major political controversy in Denmark following the publishing of 12 satirical caricatures of the Islamic prophet Muhammad on September 30, 2005, including one suggesting he had a bomb in his turban. The drawings were printed by Jyllands-Posten as a satirical illustration to go along an article on self-censorship and freedom of speech, commenting on the fact that no artist was willing to illustrate a childrens book by the Danish writer Kåre Bluitgen about Muhammad without remaining anonymous, allegedly for fear of revenge from extremist Muslims, as depicting Muhammad is prohibited according to Islamic belief. While the newspaper maintains that the drawings were an exercise in free speech, many Muslims in Denmark and further afield viewed them as a provocation. Two newspaper cartoonists were reportedly driven into hiding after death threats were issued against them and the paper has revised and heightened its security procedures.
International consequences
The embassy of Pakistan in Copenhagen told the Danish prime minister, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, to penalize the drawers, and the controversy produced labour strikes in Pakistan and Kashmir. The case is now being brought to the International Court of Justice.
Meanwhile, the Islamic Society in Denmark has proposed that a three day celebration of Muhammad should be held in Denmark, putting a focus on the prophets life. This should be coordinated in part by the Islamic Society, Jyllands-Posten and at least some of the five universities in Denmark. The universities have initially responded as being interested, Jyllands-Posten however, is hesitating.
In early January the Egyptian government threathened with a boycott, but did not carry out their threat. However people in Saudi Arabia called out for a boycott January 20th, and carried out the boycott on Danish products January 26th. The boycott primarily targetted dairy products produced by Arla, but has also hit other products. The boycott has spread to Kuwait.
A Norwegian magazine, Magazinet, printed the drawings after getting authorization from Jyllands-Posten and it led to a great debate in Norway as well. A Norwegian man made a threat against the lives of the people at the magazine, but later admitted, when faced by the police, that it was just a prank. Some Swedish newspapers has considered printing the drawings as well.
Opinions in Denmark
The general opinion in Denmark is that the drawings do not violate the law of free speech, and neither the newspaper nor the cartoonists have apologized for publishing them. The question whether the drawings should be printed has been discussed a lot in Denmark from letters to the Editors, to national television and to high schools and universities at open debate meetings.