Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:02, 29 June 2010 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 28 June 2010: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 18:13, 30 June 2010 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite/archive23.Next edit →
Line 38: Line 38:
* ] * ]
|} |}

== Hello ==

Just letting you know that that Facebook friend request you just got is from me. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-size:3">]</span><sup>]</sup> 03:44, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

An Arbitration request in which you are involved has been opened, and is located ]. Please add any evidence you wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ].

Additionally, please note that for this case specific procedural guidelines have been stipulated; if you have any questions please ]. The full outline is listed on the Evidence and Workshop pages, but please adhere to the basics:
*The issues raised in the "Sock Puppet Standards of Evidence" and "Stephen Schultz and Lar" requests may be raised and addressed in evidence in this case if (but only if) they have not been resolved by other means.
*Preparation of a formal list of "parties to the case" will not be required.
*Within five days from the opening of the case, participants are asked to provide a listing of the sub-issues that they believe should be addressed in the committee's decision. This should be done in a ] of the Workshop page designated for that purpose. Each issue should be set forth as a one-sentence, neutrally worded question—for example:
**"Should User:X be sanctioned for tendentious editing on Article:Y"?
**"Has User:Foo made personal attacks on editors of Article:Z?"
**"Did Administrator:Bar violate the ABC policy on (date)?"
**"Should the current community probation on Global Warming articles by modified by (suggested change)?"
:The committee will not be obliged to address all the identified sub-issues in its decision, but having the questions identified should help focus the evidence and workshop proposals.
*All evidence should be posted within 15 days from the opening of the case. The drafters will seek to move the case to arbitrator workshop proposals and/or a proposed decision within a reasonable time thereafter, bearing in mind the need for the committee to examine what will presumably be a very considerable body of evidence.
*Participants are urgently requested to keep their evidence and workshop proposals as concise as reasonably possible.
*The length limitation on evidence submissions is to be enforced in a flexible manner to maximize the value of each user's evidence to the arbitrators. Users who submit overlength diatribes or repetitious presentations will be asked by the clerks to pare them. On the other hand, the word limit should preferably not be enforced in a way that hampers the reader's ability to evaluate the evidence.
*All participants are expected to abide by the general guideline for Conduct on arbitration pages, which states:
*Incivility, personal attacks, and strident rhetoric should be avoided in Arbitration as in all other areas of Misplaced Pages.
*Until this case is decided, the existing community sanctions and procedures for Climate change and Global warming articles remain in full effect, and editors on these articles are expected to be on their best behavior.
*Any arbitrator, clerk, or other uninvolved administrator is authorized to block, page-ban, or otherwise appropriately sanction any participant in this case whose conduct on the case pages departs repeatedly or severely from appropriate standards of decorum. Except in truly egregious cases, a warning will first be given with a citation to this notice. (Hopefully, it will never be necessary to invoke this paragraph.)

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ~ <font color="#F09">Amory</font><font color="#555"><small> ''(] • ] • ])''</small></font> 00:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC)


== ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 14 June 2010 == == ''The Misplaced Pages Signpost'': 14 June 2010 ==

Revision as of 18:13, 30 June 2010

User:Mixwell/scrolling

Archive

Dates:

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 14 June 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Listing me as a party in the CC case

Could you give your reasons for listing me as a party in the CC case. I've never edited CC articles besides maintenance. I've only commented on three probation enforcement requests as an uninvolved admin, in a ten days period, never got myself involved in disputes between uninvolved admins. And now I am listed as an 'involved editor' in a controversial high profile case. I do not want to have anything to do with this case, and I've done to thing to have to. Cenarium (talk) 00:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 21 June 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 28 June 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)