| Revision as of 02:37, 19 June 2010 editNinly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,498 editsm cl← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:50, 3 July 2010 edit undo81.106.115.153 (talk) →Interbeing and Deep EcologyNext edit → | ||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
| Nobel Peace Prize nominee ], a follower of the Vietnamese Zen tradition, has coined the term '']'' as a synonym of ''pratityasamutpada''. This phrase expresses the reality of mutual interdependence in human relationship both in the sense of relating one to another and in the wider sense of humanity's relationship to the natural world as a whole. Hanh's presentation of "interbeing" has doctrinal antecedents in the ] of thought,<ref>McMahan, David L. ''The Making of Buddhist Modernism''. Oxford University Press: 2008 ISBN 9780195183276 pg 158</ref> which "is often said to provide a philosophical foundation" for Zen.<ref>Williams,Paul. ''Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations'' 2nd ed.Taylor & Francis, 1989, page 144</ref> | Nobel Peace Prize nominee ], a follower of the Vietnamese Zen tradition, has coined the term '']'' as a synonym of ''pratityasamutpada''. This phrase expresses the reality of mutual interdependence in human relationship both in the sense of relating one to another and in the wider sense of humanity's relationship to the natural world as a whole. Hanh's presentation of "interbeing" has doctrinal antecedents in the ] of thought,<ref>McMahan, David L. ''The Making of Buddhist Modernism''. Oxford University Press: 2008 ISBN 9780195183276 pg 158</ref> which "is often said to provide a philosophical foundation" for Zen.<ref>Williams,Paul. ''Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations'' 2nd ed.Taylor & Francis, 1989, page 144</ref> | ||
| The ] religious traditions of India (] and ]) have been characterised by an unusual sensitivity to living beings. Monks of both traditions are strictly forbidden from harming any life form, including even the smallest insects and vegetation. One of the basic ideas behind the Buddha's teaching of mutual interdependence is that ultimately there is no demarcation between what appears to be an individual creature and its environment. Harming the environment (the nexus of living beings of which one forms but a part) is thus, in a nontrivial sense, harming oneself. This philosophical position lies at the heart of modern-day ] and some representatives of this movement (e.g. ]) |
The ] religious traditions of India (] and ]) have been characterised by an unusual sensitivity to living beings. Monks of both traditions are strictly forbidden from harming any life form, including even the smallest insects and vegetation. One of the basic ideas behind the Buddha's teaching of mutual interdependence is that ultimately there is no demarcation between what appears to be an individual creature and its environment. Harming the environment (the nexus of living beings of which one forms but a part) is thus, in a nontrivial sense, harming oneself. This philosophical position lies at the heart of modern-day ] and some representatives of this movement (e.g. ]) have shown that Buddhist philosophy provides a rational basis for deep ecological thinking. | ||
| ==Notes and references== | ==Notes and references== | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 3 July 2010
| Part of a series on |
| Buddhism |
|---|
 |
| History |
| Buddhist texts |
| Practices |
| Nirvāṇa |
| Traditions |
| Buddhism by country |
.svg){kind=small}
The doctrine of pratītyasamutpāda (Template:Lang-sa; Template:Lang-pi; Template:Lang-bo; Chinese: 緣起), often translated as "dependent arising", is a cardinal doctrine within Buddhist philosophy.
It is a name given by the historical Buddha to the arising of worldly phenomena. It is variously rendered into English as "dependent origination", "conditioned genesis", "dependent co-arising", and "interdependent arising".
Overview
The Buddha's enlightenment simultaneously comprised his liberation from suffering (Pāli: dukkha; Sanskrit: duhkha) and his insight into the nature of reality, as delineated in the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path. Put another way, it is misunderstandings of reality that lead to suffering, particularly regarding "what is impermanent as permanent, what is suffering as pleasure, and what is not-self as self."
The illuminated mind, on the contrary, does not apply the conceptual categories of "being" and "non-being" to the things of experience. All things in the conventional reality arise, remain and cease in relation to other things:
When this exists, that comes to be; with the arising of this, that arises. When this does not exist, that does not come to be; with the cessation of this, that ceases. (M II 32)
The Buddha illustrated this concept, called dependent arising, with the wheel of life (Pāli: bhavacakka; Sanskrit: bhavacakra). Depicting the cycle of rebirth, the wheel of life illustrates the fact that nothing in our conventional reality "is brought about ... by any single cause alone, but by concomitance of a number of conditioning factors arising in discernibly repeated patterns." Thus, everything is dependent on and relates to something (and, ultimately, everything) else. "As far as one analyzes, one finds only dependence, relativity, and emptiness, and their dependence, relativity, and emptiness" ad infinitum.
A general formulation of dependendent arising, found in over a dozen canonical discourses, is (in English and Pali):
|
This being, That becomes. |
Imasmiṃ sati, idaṃ hoti. |
Applications
The general formulation has two well-known applications. One applies dependent origination to the concept of suffering, and takes the form of the Four Noble Truths:
- Dukkha: There is suffering. Suffering is an intrinsic part of life prior to awakening, also experienced as dissatisfaction, discontent, unhappiness, impermanence.
- Samudaya: There is a cause of suffering, which is attachment or desire (tanha).
- Nirodha: There is a way out of suffering, which is to eliminate attachment and desire.
- Magga: The path that leads out of suffering is called the Noble Eightfold Path.
The other applies dependent origination to the process of rebirth, and is known as the Twelve Nidanas. The nikayas themselves do not give a systematic explanation of the nidana series. As an expository device, the commentarial tradition presented the factors as a linear sequence spanning over three lives; this does not mean that past, present, and future factors are mutually exclusive – in fact, many sutras contend that they are not. The twelve nidanas categorized in this way are:
Former life
- ignorance
- formations (conditioned things)
Current life
- consciousness
- mind and body (personality or identity)
- the six sense bases (five physical senses and the mind)
- contact (between objects and the senses)
- feeling (registering the contact)
- craving (for continued contact)
- clinging
- becoming (similar to formations)
Future life
- birth
- old age and death
This twelve-factor formula is the most familiar presentation, though a number of early sutras introduce lesser-known variants which make it clear that the sequence of factors should not be regarded as a linear causal process in which each preceding factor gives rise to its successor through a simple reaction. The relationship among factors is always complex, involving several strands of conditioning. For example, whenever there is ignorance, craving and clinging invariably follow, and craving and clinging themselves indicate ignorance.
With respect to the destinies of human beings and animals, dependent origination has a more specific meaning, as it describes the process by which sentient beings incarnate into any given realm and pursue their various worldly projects and activities with all concomitant suffering. Among these sufferings are aging and death. Aging and death are experienced by us because birth and youth have been experienced. Without birth there is no death. One conditions the other in a mutually dependent relationship. Our becoming in the world, the process of what we call "life", is conditioned by the attachment and clinging to ideas and projects. This attachment and clinging in turn cannot exist without craving as its condition. The Buddha understood that craving comes into being because there is sensation in the body which we experience as pleasant, unpleasant or neutral. When we crave something, it is the sensation induced by contact with the desired object that we crave rather than the object itself. Sensation is caused by contact with such objects of the senses. The contact or impression made upon the senses (manifesting as sensation) is itself dependent upon the six sense organs which themselves are dependent upon the psychophysical entity that a human being is. The whole process is summarized by the Buddha as follows:
| English Terms | Sanskrit Terms |
|---|---|
| With Ignorance as condition, Mental Formations arise | With Avidyā as condition, Saṃskāra arises |
| With Mental Formations as condition, Consciousness arises | With Saṃskāra as condition, Vijñāna arises |
| With Consciousness as condition, Name and Form arise | With Vijñāna as condition, Nāmarūpa arises |
| With Name & Form as condition, Sense Gates arise | With Nāmarūpa as condition, Ṣaḍāyatana arises |
| With Sense Gates as condition, Contact arises | With Ṣaḍāyatana as condition, Sparśa arises |
| With Contact as condition, Feeling arises | With Sparśa as condition, Vedanā arises |
| With Feeling as condition, Craving arises | With Vedanā as condition, Tṛṣṇā arises |
| With Craving as condition, Clinging arises | With Tṛṣṇā as condition, Upādāna arises |
| With Clinging as condition, Becoming arises | With Upādāna as condition, Bhava arises |
| With Becoming as a condition, Birth arises | With Bhava as condition, Jāti arises |
| With Birth as condition, Aging and Dying arise | With Jāti as condition, Jarāmaraṇa arises |
The thrust of the formula is such that when certain conditions are present, they give rise to subsequent conditions, which in turn give rise to other conditions and the cyclical nature of life in Samsara can be seen. This is graphically illustrated in the Bhavacakra (wheel of life).
Contemporary teachers often teach that it can also be seen as a daily cycle occurring from moment to moment throughout each day. There is scriptural support for this as an explanation in the Abhidharmakosa of Vasubandhu, insofar as Vasubandu states that on occasion "the twelve parts are realized in one and the same moment":.
For example, in the case of avidyā, the first condition, it is necessary to refer to the three marks of existence for a full understanding of its relation to pratityasamutpada. It is also necessary to understand the Three Fires and how they fit into the scheme. The Three Fires sit at the very center of the schemata in the Bhavacakra and drive the whole edifice. In Himalayan iconographic representations of the Bhavacakra such as within Tibetan Buddhism, the Three Fires are known as the Three Poisons which are often represented as the Gankyil. The Gankyil is also often represented as the hub of the Dharmacakra.
Nirvana is often conceived of as stopping this cycle. By removing the causes for craving, craving ceases. So, with the ceasing of birth, death ceases. With the ceasing of becoming, birth ceases, and so on, until with the ceasing of ignorance no karma is produced, and the whole process of death and rebirth ceases.
Madhyamaka and Pratityasamutpada
See also: MūlamadhyamakakārikāThough the formulations above appear might seem to imply that pratityasamutpada is a straightforward causal model, in the hands of the Madhyamaka school, pratityasamutpada is used to demonstrate the very lack of inherent causality, in a manner that appears somewhat similar to the ideas of David Hume. Many scholars have agreed that the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā is one of the earliest interpretations of Buddha's teaching on paramartha originated from Pratītyasamutpāda .
The conclusion of the Madhyamikas is that causation, like being, must be regarded as a merely conventional truth (saṃvṛti), and that to take it as really (or essentially) existing would be both a logical error and a perceptual one, arising from ignorance and a lack of spiritual insight.
According to the analysis of Nāgārjuna, the most prominent Madhyamika, true causality depends upon the intrinsic existence of the elements of the causal process (causes and effects), which would violate the principle of anatman, but pratītyasamutpāda does not imply that the apparent participants in arising are essentially real.
Because of the interdependence of causes and effects (because a cause depends on its effect to be a cause, as effect depends on cause to be an effect), it is quite meaningless to talk about them as existing separately. However, the strict identity of cause and effect is also refuted, since if the effect were the cause, the process of origination could not have occurred. Thus both monistic and dualistic accounts of causation are rejected.
Therefore Nāgārjuna explains that the śūnyatā (or emptiness) of causality is demonstrated by the interdependence of cause and effect, and likewise that the interdependence (pratītyasamutpāda) of causality itself is demonstrated by its anatta.
In his Entry to the middle way, Candrakirti asserts, "If a cause produces its requisite effect, then, on that very account, it is a cause. If no effect is produced, then, in the absence of that, the cause does not exist."
Pratityasamutpada in Dzogchen
In Dzogchen tradition the interdependent origination is considered illusory:
, "all these (configurations of events and meanings) come about and disappear according to dependent origination." But, like a burnt seed, since a nonexistent (result) does not come about from a nonexistent (cause), cause and effect do not exist. What appears as a world of apparently external phenomena, is the play of energy of sentient beings. There is nothing external or separate from the individual. Everything that manifests in the individual's field of experience is a continuum. This is the Great Perfection that is discovered in the Dzogchen practice.
"Being obsessed with entities, one's experiencing itself , which discriminates each cause and effect, appears as if it were cause and condition."
Dependent arising of enlightenment
Pratityasamutpada is most commonly used to explain how suffering arises depending on certain conditions, the implication being that if one or more of the conditions are removed (if the "chain" is broken), suffering will cease. There is also a text, the Upanisa Sutta in the Samyutta Nikaya, in which a discussion of the conditions not for suffering but for enlightenment are given. This application of the principle of dependent arising is referred to in Theravada exegetical literature as "transcendental dependent arising". The chain in this case is:
- suffering (dukkha)
- faith (saddhā)
- joy (pāmojja, pāmujja)
- rapture (pīti)
- tranquillity (passaddhi)
- happiness (sukha)
- concentration (samādhi)
- knowledge and vision of things as they are (yathābhūta-ñāna-dassana)
- disenchantment with worldly life (nibbidā)
- dispassion (virāga)
- freedom, release, emancipation (vimutti, a synonym for nibbana)
- knowledge of destruction of the cankers (āsava-khaye-ñāna)
Interbeing and Deep Ecology
 | This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Nobel Peace Prize nominee Thich Nhat Hanh, a follower of the Vietnamese Zen tradition, has coined the term Interbeing as a synonym of pratityasamutpada. This phrase expresses the reality of mutual interdependence in human relationship both in the sense of relating one to another and in the wider sense of humanity's relationship to the natural world as a whole. Hanh's presentation of "interbeing" has doctrinal antecedents in the Huayan school of thought, which "is often said to provide a philosophical foundation" for Zen.
The Sramanic religious traditions of India (Theravada Buddhism and Jainism) have been characterised by an unusual sensitivity to living beings. Monks of both traditions are strictly forbidden from harming any life form, including even the smallest insects and vegetation. One of the basic ideas behind the Buddha's teaching of mutual interdependence is that ultimately there is no demarcation between what appears to be an individual creature and its environment. Harming the environment (the nexus of living beings of which one forms but a part) is thus, in a nontrivial sense, harming oneself. This philosophical position lies at the heart of modern-day deep ecology and some representatives of this movement (e.g. Joanna Macy) have shown that Buddhist philosophy provides a rational basis for deep ecological thinking.
Notes and references
- "Is the doctrine of interdependent origination a metaphysical teaching? The answer depends on one's definition of metaphysics. In this paper, metaphysics describes the character that anything has insofar as it is anything at all. Interdependent origination seems to fit this description." Thinking through Myths: Philosophical Perspectives, by Kevin Schilbrack. Routledge: 2002. ISBN 0415254612
- "Suffice it to emphasize that the doctrine of dependent origination is not a metaphysical doctrine, in the sense that it does not affirm or deny some super-sensible entities or realities; rather, it is a proposition arrived at through an examination and analysis of the world of phenomena ..." Frank J. Hoffman, Deegalle Mahinda, Pāli Buddhism. Routledge, 1996, page 177. .
- Garfield, Jay L. "Dependent Arising and the Emptiness:Why did Nagarjuna start with Causation? Philosophy East and West Volume 44, Number 2 April 1994
- Harvey, Peter, An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), p. 3
- Waldron, S. William. "The Buddhist Unconscious – The ālaya-vijnāna in the context of Indian Buddhist thought" (Oxon: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003, repr. 2005), p.9
- Garfield, Jay L., The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 294
- Waldron, S. William, The Buddhist Unconscious – The ālaya-vijnāna in the context of Indian Buddhist thought (Oxon: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003, repr. 2005), p.9-11
- Garfield, Jay L., The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 209
- Waldron, S. William, The Buddhist Unconscious – The ālaya-vijnāna in the context of Indian Buddhist thought (Oxon: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003, repr. 2005), p. 13
- Waldron, S. William, The Buddhist Unconscious – The ālaya-vijnāna in the context of Indian Buddhist thought (Oxon: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003, repr. 2005), p. 16
- Garfield, Jay L., The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 177
- The general formula can be found in the following discourses in the Pali Canon: MN 79, MN 115, SN 12.21, SN 12.22, SN 12.37, SN 12.41, SN 12.49, SN 12.50, SN 12.61, SN 12.62, SN 55.28, AN 10.92, Ud. 1.1 (first two lines), Ud. 1.2 (last two lines), Ud. 1.3, Nd2, Patis.
- Thanissaro Bhikkhu (2005). Assutava Sutta: Uninstructed (SN 12.61). Retrieved 2008-01-20 from "Access to Insight" at http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn12/sn12.061.than.html.
- Bhikkhu Bodhi, In the Buddha's Words. Wisdom Publications, 2005, page 313.
- ^ Bhikkhu Bodhi, In the Buddha's Words. Wisdom Publications, 2005, page 314.
- Bhikkhu Bodhi, In the Buddha's Words. Wisdom Publications, 2005, page 316.
- Abhidharmakosa, by Vasubandhu. Translated by Leo Pruden, Vol. II, pgs 404-405.
- Magiliola, Robert (2004). "Nagarjuna and Chi-Tsang on the Value of This World: A Reply to Kuang-Ming Wu's Critique of indian and Chinese Madhyamika Buddhism". Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 31 (4). John Wiley & Sons: 505–516. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6253.2004.00168.x.
{{cite journal}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help); Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - Chinn, Ewing (2001). "Nāgārjuna's Fundamental Doctrine of Pratītyasamutpāda". Philosophy East and West. 51 (1). University of Hawai'i Press: 54–72. Retrieved 20 August 2009.
{{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|coauthors=(help) - Norbu (1999), pp. 99, 101
- From byang chub sems bsgom pa, by Mañjusrîmitra. Primordial experience. An Introduction to rDzogs-chen Meditation, pp. 60, 61
- Bhikkhu Bodhi, "Transcendental Dependent Arising: A Translation and Exposition of the Upanisa Sutta." .
- Paul Williams, Buddhism: The early Buddhist schools and doctrinal history ; Theravāda doctrine. Taylor & Francis, 2005, page 147.
- McMahan, David L. The Making of Buddhist Modernism. Oxford University Press: 2008 ISBN 9780195183276 pg 158
- Williams,Paul. Mahāyāna Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations 2nd ed.Taylor & Francis, 1989, page 144
See also
External links
- Digital Dictionary of Buddhism
- Kamma & the Ending of Kamma
- Maha-nidana Sutta
- Paticca-samuppada-vibhanga Sutta
- Upanisa Sutta translation by Bhikkhu Thanissaro
- A Translation and Exposition of the Upanisa Sutta by Bhikkhu Bodhi
- A Comprehensive Discourse on Paticcasamuppada by Mahasi Sayadaw
- Notes on Dhamma - A Note on Paticcasamuppāda by Nanavira Thera
- Bhikkhu Thanissaro: The Shape of Suffering: A Study of Dependent Co-arising (PDF-Dokument; 744 kb)
