| Revision as of 19:24, 29 January 2006 editMantanmoreland (talk | contribs)5,801 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:24, 29 January 2006 edit undoMantanmoreland (talk | contribs)5,801 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| == Neutral POV violations == | == Neutral POV violations == | ||
| Appreciate the assistance in rectifying persistent POV violations in short-selling page.--] 19:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC) | Appreciate the assistance in rectifying persistent POV violations in short-selling page.--] 19:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ---- | |||
| Note that the page has been vandalized -- again. Different ISP number, same vandalism -- an apparent sockpuppet.--] 20:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:24, 29 January 2006
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Archives:
Adminship
You wouldn't happen to be interested in adminship, would you? NSLE (T+C) 06:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Late February would be the best time, now would be too soon. NSLE (T+C) 07:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
User:WAvegetarian and Thistheman
Thanks for the reversion. I have been checking my watchlist more than I can afford to due to RL time constraints in part becuase of stuff like this. It's nice to know that someone's watching out for my page while I'm gone. —WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONS• • 07:15, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Please Help with a user User:CthulhuFhtagn to stop editing my page
This user repeatly keeps editing my team wiki page. He keeps added a section to my teams page that we are accused of an act called Zerging. He has changed it multiple times and wont respond to my warnings. Is there a way to prevent this user from vandalizing my teams page Thanks Skeletor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.46.202.226 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
In Regard to My Warnings
I am sorry. I allowed one of my nephews to check out Misplaced Pages while I was at work. I am a supporter of Misplaced Pages and will try harder to become constructive and punish my nephew for this attrocity. I am terribly sorry for any problems that this incident may have caused.-207.69.137.26 http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:207.69.137.26
The Vandalism IRC channel
Sorry it took so long to get your request processed, it normally goes quite a bit faster. It was absolutely nothing personal, there was nothing wrong with your request, the people in the channel (myself included) just all thought someone else was handling it... Anyhow, we hope to see you around, you are very welcome to join us! --JoanneB 23:29, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Please accept my embarrassingly belated thank you for supporting my RfA, which much to my surprise passed 102/1/1, earning me minor notoriety. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have already started doing the things poeple wanted me to be able to do. And hopefully nothing else... Just zis Guy, you know? /
AfD? 12:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Abortion
You have this wrong: read it carefully —Achille 2006-01-25 03:15Z
- pro-life (prō-līf')
- adj.
- Advocating full legal protection of human embryos or fetuses, especially by opposing legalized abortion.
- Oops, my bad. —Achille 2006-01-25 03:21Z
Your revert on the Pakistan page
Sorry about changing the version back, but an anonoymous editor (65.92.244.156) twice inserted a change about Jinnah without explaining why. After two reversions, this user David Matthews suddenly appeared and made the same change without explaining. I know you reverted user 70.31.11.199 edit but I felt the need to change back to before David Matthews. Thanks Green Giant 03:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Award
Thanks!
Well, I briefly considered being nonchalant as though receiving barnstars happens to me all the time, but... Thanks! That was the first one I've been given, and it came at an especially good time; I've been getting very frustrated with my several attempts to work with editors on high-conflict pages as my major contribution. To have my efforts at cleanup/rewrite recognized so quickly goes a long way toward making me feel that I can have a positive impact on WP.
In fact, I'm going to drop my wikistress meter down a level, thanks, ESkog!
Fox1 (talk) 21:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Re: 221.169.51.189
Regarding the message you left at User talk:221.169.51.189 this is liley an open proxy being used by User:Bonaparte banned indef for running a sock farm through open proxies used for 3RR workaround, RFAdm multiple voting and trolling. His othe proxy I exposed having been blocked by Mikka just minutes ago, makes clear why he chose to vandalize the pages of these particular users this time. Open proxies should be banned as per WP policy. Reagards, --Irpen 20:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
my rfa
thanks for you support on my rfa Benon 06:35, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Mb1000's Request for adminship
Hi, this is Mb1000. You recently voted Neutral on my request for adminship. Is there anyway you could reconsider and vote to Support me? I'd really appreciate it. Thanks. --Mb1000 18:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
P.S. If you have any questions you'd like to ask me, just post them on the comments page. I'll answer them as soon as I see them. Thanks.
I'm sorry you misunderstood me, ESkog. I was not intending to pressure you or anything. Just asking you to reconsider. :) --Mb1000 19:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Neutral POV violations
Appreciate the assistance in rectifying persistent POV violations in short-selling page.--Mantanmoreland 19:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Note that the page has been vandalized -- again. Different ISP number, same vandalism -- an apparent sockpuppet.--Mantanmoreland 20:24, 29 January 2006 (UTC)