| Revision as of 05:39, 10 July 2010 editBetacommand (talk | contribs)86,927 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:38, 10 July 2010 edit undoMemphisto (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers10,732 edits →Comments by other users: response to User:BetacommandNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== | ||
| {{usercompare|Dmurawski}} I would almost consider this a ] but would prefer to have a CU confirm/deny it before requesting blocks. ] 05:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC) | {{usercompare|Dmurawski}} I would almost consider this a ] but would prefer to have a CU confirm/deny it before requesting blocks. ] 05:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :It is shame that the UserCompare tool does not show the edits to the deleted articles ], ] and ]. It might also be a good idea to ] the ] article. ] (]) 13:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%"> Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments </span>====== | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 10 July 2010
– This SPI case is open.
Dmurawski
Dmurawski (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Dmurawski/Archive.
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
25 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- 66.41.49.195 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Bracelett (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Iongatherer (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Memphisto
User:66.41.49.195 is a one trick pony. Subsequent creation of User:Bracelett following semi-protection of article Derek Murawski, and if it wasn't obvious enough, this: User talk:Memphisto#Wow.
User:Dmurawski has said that he is Derek Murawski, and along with his other suspected sock puppets User:Jorotayahbl and User:71.193.87.216 has created his vanity article on three occasions - Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/DMurawski (deleted May 2008) and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Derek Murawski twice (deleted December 2009 and June 2010).
Another one trick pony, User:Iongatherer has an older version of the article in his sandbox User:Iongatherer/Derek Murawski. Memphisto (talk) 23:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
Template:Usercompare I would almost consider this a WP:DUCK but would prefer to have a CU confirm/deny it before requesting blocks. β 05:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- It is shame that the UserCompare tool does not show the edits to the deleted articles Derek Murawski, DMurawski and Red Rover (feat. Rap Barbie). It might also be a good idea to WP:SALT the Derek Murawski article. Memphisto (talk) 13:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Categories: